AD by race

I have a running theory that Alzheimer’s is a cro thing, whereas schizos are more thal. Clicking around, I ran into a devious bit of statistical deception.

Another large study, the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiological Studies of the Elderly project, found no differences in frequency of dementia between African Americans and whites. This study described a sample of 4,136 participants (Fillenbaum et al., 1998), 55 percent of whom were African American. The sample was defined using multistage probability sampling with unequal probabilities of selection to sample community-dwelling residents age 65 and older within five adjacent counties, one urban and four rural. However, the way in which the racial groups were defined is unclear. The authors used the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) Neuropsychological Test battery to assess cognitive functioning, and norms correcting for years of education (Unverzagt, Hall, Torke, and Rediger, 1996) were used for the determination of significant cognitive deficit and dementia. The prevalence of dementia among elders above age 67, as determined by clinical consensus, was 7 percent for African Americans and 7.2 percent for whites. There were also no differences in the 3-year incidence of dementia for African Americans (5.8 percent) versus whites (6.2 percent). The authors did not report incidence of dementia subtypes; therefore, it is possible that although the overall rates of dementia were similar among African Americans and whites, the frequencies of AD and vascular dementia may differ within the groups.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25535/

That’s the conclusion? Similar rates? There are lies and damned lies.

By correcting for postsecondary education, it is as if the researchers had decided to study only high school graduates. (This is not precisely true, so think of it as a thought experiment which illustrates the statistical idea.) This would exclude a significant number of AARP-eligible whites and a negligible number of blacks.

Remember, this study was in 1998 and deals with elders more than 67 years old, or those born before 1931, at least. Brown v. Board of Education was in 1954. This is not to say that recent black academic achievement is stellar, only that the bias is systematic.

Having compared, apple-to-apple, almost the entire black population with only low-performing whites, the study unjustifiably extrapolated its conclusions to the entire white population. This might have been justified if we believed that Alzheimer’s were due in part to a deficit of education, but that is silly on its face. It’s akin to accusing a comatose man of laziness.

Of course, when it comes to free tax handouts the blinders come off immediately:

The proportion of ethnic minorities among the elderly in the United States is increasing. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that the proportion of elders who are white and non-Hispanic will decline from 87 percent in 1990 to 67 percent in 2050. As compared to the 1990 Census, the population of Hispanic elders is expected to double in 2010, and will be 11 times greater by 2050. Of the 80.1 million elderly projected for 2050, 8.4 million (10.4 percent) will be black, as compared to 8 percent of elders in 1990. With these changes, ethnic minority populations will bear an increased share of the economic and social burden associated with diseases that predominantly affect the elderly, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This presents the potential for a major public health issue because ethnic minorities may be at higher risk for AD and dementia than non-Hispanic whites.

Ibid.

Advertisements

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to AD by race

  1. Heaviside says:

    I thought we agreed that schizophrenia was a parietal thing? I was conversing the other day with the proprietor of an antiques store who seemed to have a pretty serious m-back, and he told me that not only had he been visited by UFOs five times, but that his sister was a clairvoyant who had been scouted by the CIA’s remote viewing program. He also told me that he didn’t believe the claims of a friend of his who lived out in the woods concerning the construction of a perpetual motion machine.

    I think this just proves that some people get all the luck.

    • Aeoli Pera says:

      Lol, it doesn’t surprise me that you’d envy them.

      Schizophrenia and AD are undoubtedly pathologies, and not the direct result of processing styles. The symptoms depend mostly on which parts of the brain have broken down first. I said it’s a “thal” thing because it’s an early-onset disease (K vs. r), and correlates with other “thal” personality traits. But the fact that schizos experience more visuospatial delusions (here I’m assuming hallucinations are a small subset of delusions) is due to their intact occipital buns.

      Not a great explanation, but I’m leaving it. Maybe a final summary: delusion is due to deterioration, and visual hallucinations occur under general deterioration where the visuospatial circuit is still undamaged.

      Having stated it succinctly, I can think of some easy criticisms. Oh well, such is the sublime toil of genius. X-)

      • Heaviside says:

        >I said it’s a “thal” thing because it’s an early-onset disease (K vs. r), and correlates with other “thal” personality traits.

        Melons a K-selected too.

        Occam’s Razor: melonheads just attract more UFOs. I like that explanation more.

        Better still:

        “And Hegelian philosophy is also, in a sense, a kind of magical cognition since it is a presuppositionless science, founded, literally, upon Nothing.”

        He was probably a melon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s