Modular edenic theory of extreme melon IQ

There are two sorts of extreme IQs I’d like to talk about: melon and thal. There may be others, but I don’t have a theory to explain those yet. I’m going to start with melons because it’s a quicker explanation.

Beyond a baseline healthfulness and capacity for growth of new neurons, axons, synapses, etc., IQ is not a very useful measure for general ability (as in Spearman’s g). After that, IQ scores grow according to the healthy production of special modules that happen to be useful for answering problems on IQ tests, like having a large working memory, high spatial manipulation ability, etc.

These modules don’t always play nice. For instance, a person with mixed melon and sapiens genes may have a functioning southbridge (we’re playing loose with analogies here) but no memory management controller. This is effectively “retardation” in the truest sense, even though the brain will make use of the extra space due to the miracle of neuroplasticity, and the person will still have a fairly high IQ. (This is another reason I often describe thals as thards: because we’re all probably poorly mixed.) However, the brain can’t make better use of the space than its original design for a full melon brain: a southbridge cooperating with an MMC is a powerful combination.

Now, consider somebody like Goethe. If we believe that intelligence is strictly distributed according to a bell curve (or approximation), then Goethe is one of those guys who should not exist. Estimates of his IQ vary, but they are all north of 200-205. This statistical rarity essentially disproves the hypothesis that genetic correlation will tell us which switches to turn on/off for everyone to have the highest possible IQ: there is competition among them to determine two or more conflicting archetypal designs for the brain.

In Goethe’s case, there is no such conflict (or much less than usual) so that all of the modules are working together in a holistic fashion. It’s not that his brain is greater than the sum of its parts, it’s that everyone else is retarded because they are either pure homo sapiens, or they are trying to put two different chipsets on the same motherboard.

Something else this indicates is that a full melon is going to have an IQ north of 200. Goethe’s head is not unusually large, although it obviously grew continuously over his lifespan like a turtle’s shell. (Go here and scroll down for the gallery of portraits over time.)

Now, I mentioned that neuroplasticity plays a big role here. That’s true: if a special module exists in the brain somewhere, then the rest of the brain will hack together a connection and find some way to make use of it. But this will not necessarily be the best use…unless the brain is following the optimized genetic blueprint laid out by one of the high-IQ racial archetypes. This is especially true for melonheads, whereas the situation for neanderthals gets a little weird due to cognitive style.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Modular edenic theory of extreme melon IQ

  1. My brain is hacked together. I think we can agree on that. In that regard this post makes a lot of sense to me thanks. My psychological development has felt a lot like making meals out of Christmas Dinner leftovers. But isn’t it strange that Boxing Day leftovers can often have a unique satisfaction of their own? And that even when the Romans spiked Greek wine with pine resin that it developed its owned acquired taste that they continued to savour for centuries thereafter? What better conception is there of the raw beauty of the universe than the evolutionary adaptability of a thing that was never meant to be? That that which was cast in iniquity might be consumed by that which it was intended to destroy. Crushed and eaten until I become all the trillion diamond shards.

    And perhaps while the men of the dark age cannot attain the archetypal conception of themselves, we are standing at the precipice of such great potentiality that we *are* the archetypes. All my archetypal memories are of destruction and great pain. Of rivers of blood and nightmares. There is a better way.

  2. Craig says:

    Been thinking about this, may have something else to add, still re reading, reading new stuff and thinking on it… I believe certain genetics would also be involved.

  3. Pingback: Myopia as an indicator for mutation accumulation in populations | Aeoli Pera

  4. Pingback: A brief trip down memory lane | Aeoli Pera

  5. Aton says:

    It’s hard to imagine Geothe actually having a 200 IQ, if he could have been administered an IQ test. Of course his g was outrageous. None the less I’m skeptical that scores mean much after, say, conservatively, 145, but probably as low as 135. People attribute massive scores to the great geniuses of the past in order to make extreme IQ scores look like credible approximations for real intelligence.

    (Nothing else to support my opinion, it’s just a hunch).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s