Strong men, weak men, and women running amok

From Alpha Game, Vox explains why false rape accusations are taken seriously:

Men of low socio-sexual rank are the core of the problem here, because they simply refuse to believe women are anything but pure, innocent creatures taken advantage of by evil higher-rank men.

Yes, young women are crazy. This is known. This is not new. What is new is the way in which they are not only permitted to run amok, but encouraged to do so.

The ironic thing is that it is almost never the genuinely bad boys who are accused of rape. It’s usually the delta who thought he got lucky and outkicked his coverage one night.

Vox Day
Deltas and Gammas are the real problem

I’m going to extend this a bit further, but this isn’t a disagreement at all. Feminism exists because weak men run amok (pedestalize), that is certainly true.

However, weak men will do and believe as they’re told. They share this quality with women in lesser quantity. The reason weak men are, analogously, allowed to run amok is that they have no strong men in their lives because our society is atomized to a historically unprecedented extreme. Alpha males (the historical “patriarch” types) have reneged on their responsibility to prefer their own communities, instead preferring to schmooze with each other. There will always be weaker men, just as there will always be X and Y chromosomes. It’s chimp tribal logic- the tribe that refuses to produce a quantity of low-quality men will be overrun by more numerous tribes (see neanderthals).

And so, without tribal leaders to follow the Deltas and Gammas follow the media and the government instead.

Advertisements

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

34 Responses to Strong men, weak men, and women running amok

  1. Mycroft Jones says:

    Well written. In the Bible, it says, you shall only choose one of your brethren to lead you. The leadership classes of the white countries have chosen to marry among their class, instead of staying local and marrying into a local family one rung down. The anti-Bible inheritance laws also factor into this; it is about concentrating wealth, rather than increasing the total sum of wealth.

    Also, the “alphas” are busy whoring the women of all classes and stations, leaving the deltas and gammas with, frankly, a really stinky pill to swallow; if they want pussy at all, they have to take the leftovers. Not only do they have to be content with the blue haired fatty, but also, “No virgin for you!” This scorched earth policy hinders family formation and child production. This is why the developed countries are suffering dearth; the population explosion is a big misdirection; we are actually suffering from birth rates that are way too low for a healthy society.

    • Aeoli Pera says:

      Yup, and suppressing the truth of this allows the destruction of the white race to continue unchecked.

      Good points all around.

      • Mycroft Jones says:

        Look at Princess Diana… she chose to marry an Arab of the same social class as her, rather than finding someone of her own tribe/nation.

  2. Heaviside says:

    Somehow low-status men had the power to completely eradicate the foundations of society and yet they still can’t get women to sleep with them.

    Yes goyim, please keep blaming yourselves.

    This interview is completely dishonest. Steinem didn’t just happen to get help from the CIA — she owed her whole existence as a public figure to them.

    Anyways, I suggest that we just ignore all of this and continue punching down on the victims.

  3. podrag says:

    I think this is Vox’s predatory side coming out a bit. First status is a misnomer because we all know that there are many low status men who are very necessary and useful to society, industrial society couldn’t function without them, they bear a ridiculous proportion of the load and many middling status men who are just gobshites. I mean Vox himself, what’s he ever done part from write stuff? He holds quite a high opinion of himself for someone who writes blogs and fucks women. Second despite rumours to the contrary women can actually read and are capable of controlling themselves.

    Deciding who to hold to account is a subjective thing and it’s not very ‘high status’ of Vox to throw those who don’t know any better under the bus. He’s not being discerning enough with the reality of the situation. Really the problems are the fault of everyone to a greater or lesser degree. If we need a die off we need one that’s indiscriminate of social status. This is why God sends plagues to teach everyone a damn good lesson. I’m inclined to side with Heaviside.

    • podrag says:

      When those with supposed high status start blaming the database guy for the ills of society I’m thinking that’s the point at which God begins to think about smiting.

      • podrag says:

        Another thing. Status is how women think, it’s a very female/faggoty mentality. If you’re trying to build and sell something it no longer becomes about status, it becomes about doing shit. Who gives a fuck about status when you can make nuclear weapons? This whole game mentality is quite gay in the literal sense of the word. It’s extreme effinimate Babylonianism and why countries like France always lose in the end.

        • Aeoli Pera says:

          >Bosses, managers, and Gammas (social successes) are what women flock to for leadership in the modern era. Low T males are solipsistic and have no concept of leadership outside of work/chain of command hierarchies looks like.

          Formal, explicit hierarchies as opposed to male dominance or prestige hierarchies, in other words. The shoe fits.

          >An example of this is your hipster “bad-boy” covered in patches and tattoos. Hes not a leader, but rather is mimicking short term r-selected strategies of mate selection (i.e. status and spoils of war.)

          Style without substance is incentivized more in a more atomized society.

          • j says:

            to be pedantic, it’s not even “style over substance” per se, but rather the question of what ((society)) defines “substance” to be. there is no question that the average beta is no match for an alpha whether in terms of looks, rhetorical ability, or ((insert alpha-favoring metric here)).

            mediocre men sense, rightly so, that they’ve been sold out by the union comprised of alphas+women. women will _follow_ only alphas, meanwhile women dictate who is attractive and who is unattractive. alphas have a vested interest in keeping society organized in such a way (i.e. inertia, #PathOfLeastResistance) that women remain firmly in their power position as sociosexual gatekeeper.

            even though this is antagonistic to the interests of men as a whole, the payoff for the alphas (sociosexual dominance, fathering children with prime females) is too lucrative to pass up.

            the compassionate alphas give advice to mediocre men on how to emulate alpha behavior, but this is not entirely altruistic. on a long enough timescale, this perpetuates the structure of the existing sociosexual hierarchy while preventing a class revolution / paradigm shift in favor of the beta phrenotype. because (1) betas waste their lifespans trying to emulate that which is soul-poison to them; and (2) because if the Game is played out on the alphas’ terms, the naturals always come out far ahead – statistically.

            /shitpost

          • j says:

            it does make me disillusioned that i’m as fallen as any leftist in saying these things.

          • podrag says:

            It’s not about right or wrong it’s just about what ‘is’ which is essentially quite shit. Life has no right answers. Pick your poison.

        • Aeoli Pera says:

          Speaking from a primatology standpoint, I have to disagree somewhat. Dominance-hierarchy males also think in terms of status primarily.

          However…what you’re saying is generally the case for white humans, because cro magnon seems to practice male transference, i.e. males leave the breeding group to enter another breeding group, and settle down there.

        • j says:

          vox once wrote a blog post responding to a guest’s email arguing the same point. to paraphrase, “the fact that you think ‘getting shit done’ is what matters, is what gives away your Delta status. if people don’t look to you for leadership, you’re not an alpha. period.”

          which misses the point, because ((people)) in a feminine-primary society give more weight to what women think. in a feminine-primary society, those tier-2 men who – under a patriarchy – would have exercised some amount of leadership, instead have nothing.

      • Aeoli Pera says:

        It’s difficult to pin down exactly what his earthly plans are getting at, although he seems to be a eugenicist. So maybe?

    • Aeoli Pera says:

      >First status is a misnomer because we all know that there are many low status men who are very necessary and useful to society, industrial society couldn’t function without them, they bear a ridiculous proportion of the load and many middling status men who are just gobshites.

      I wouldn’t mind using different labels if “status” doesn’t work for you. You have that melonhead that makes you care about propagating the connotations of propaganda terms.

      > I mean Vox himself, what’s he ever done part from write stuff? He holds quite a high opinion of himself for someone who writes blogs and fucks women.

      He’s done some other stuff, but the irrational confidence is specifically from clinical narcissism (not the neurotic sort Anonymous Conservative talks about). He’s been very open about this and I can respect that, see my comment here: https://voxday.blogspot.com/2016/02/thank-you-for-coming.html#c4127064729841822621

      >Deciding who to hold to account is a subjective thing and it’s not very ‘high status’ of Vox to throw those who don’t know any better under the bus. He’s not being discerning enough with the reality of the situation.

      He does very well for a guy who isn’t perfect. Balancing discernment with populist demagoguery is an incredibly difficult task and you almost never see somebody who does both well.

  4. Wog Slayer says:

    I am pretty sure no one should trust Ted Beale/VD. He has knack for saying stuff 360 degrees of the truth and defending himself by short quips about his intelligence/masculinity. Not to forget his praise of ad hominem attack strategies and denial of scientific sophistication in pre-christian Europe.

  5. Wog Slayer says:

    Vox Day is essentially a high-testosterone far-right conservative version of Robert Lindsay. The two are practically psychological twins.

  6. bicebicebice says:

    “Alpha males (the historical “patriarch” types) have reneged on their responsibility to prefer their own communities, instead preferring to schmooze with each other.”

    I just call it the Internet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s