I have three criticisms in particular.
1. AC says conservatives are K. But conservatives have lots of kids and prefer less crowded ecological niches, i.e. living in the country rather than the cite. Having more kids in low-population areas is literally the definition of R. Liberals have fewer kids, prefer high-population areas and spend more money on each kid. However AC has the spirit right, which is that liberals are passive aggressive fags, and getting the spirit right covers over a multitude of technicalities (Jesus harped on this point constantly).
2. AC describes K-conservatives as “competitors”. This is something where I disagree in spirit. Liberals compete for turf more effectively and more often, e.g. gentrification. But it’s passive-aggressive, therefore more difficult to observe. They might shy away from boxing gyms, but that just means they’re pussies. However, modern humans compete for the same niche in the ecology (i.e. real estate and social position) via politics, and liberals are better at this because they are calculating, manipulative, and aggressively passive-aggressive. By comparison, conservatives are gullible and complacent. They generally flee to lower cost-of-living areas with less competition rather than play school district gerrymandering games with their Nice Hwhite Neighbors.
3. This last one isn’t really a disagreement so much as a paradigm shift: I don’t think the K strategy has anything to do with intra-species competition, but is rather a survival strategy for harsh environments. I believe it’s a sociosexual strategy optimized for avoiding disasters, because genetic drift is a stronger factor for smaller populations. For example, in a small tribe all of the people with “hunter” genes might be in the same place (out hunting) and get wiped out by a single forest fire, causing extinction of those genes, whereas natural selection is more important for very large populations.
Thus the conservative obsession with The Apocalypse. Itz coming. In the conservative mind, ITZ always coming. Because they’re wired to avoid genetic drift events, hence why they predict about 17 real apocalypses for every real one. R is about winning the natural selection game through competition, which focuses on preferring competitive genes because other members of the species are the enemy, whereas the natural environment is presumed to be relatively safe.
(Compare to dysgenics, which is neither R nor K.)