First attempt to describe Koanic’s Mohawk theory

See the picture gallery for definitions of the cranial regions.

This is the theory as I understand it. Most of the entries are guesses. Figure he’ll tell me where it’s wrong :-P.

Forehead:
Empathy group horizon ~ 10^5
Political allegiance: Dialect group, nation
Psychophilosophy: Statism (“That which is good for people who talk like me is good for me.”)
Value: Virtue signalling, social prestige, mores

Pre-Forehead:
Empathy group horizon ~ 10,000
Political allegiance: City
Psychophilosophy: Racism (“That which is good for people who look like me is good for me.”)
Value: Civic order, honest bargaining

Front-Cone:
Empathy group horizon ~ 1,000
Political allegiance: Tribe
Psychophilosophy: Tribalism (“That which is good for my people is good for me.”)
Value: Martial virtue, social dominance

Back-Cone:
Empathy group horizon ~ 100
Political allegiance: Clan
Psychophilosophy: Monarchism, patriarchalism (“That which is good for my extended family is good for me.”)
Value: Social hierarchy

Backswept:
Empathy group horizon ~ 10
Political allegiance: Family
Psychophilosophy: Nepotism (“That which is good for my family is good for me.”)
Value: Respect

Fauxcippital:
Empathy group horizon ~ 1
Political allegiance: Self
Psychophilosophy: Egoism (“That which is good for me, is good.”)
Value: Individual virtue

Occipital:
Empathy group horizon ~ 0
Political allegiance: Aesthetics (Purely perceiving, emotional, reactive)
Psychophilosophy: Autism (“That which seems good, is good.”)
Value: Goodfeelz, stimulation

Taking this a bit further, I suggest that Glenn’s idea of value stratification is related to an proportional overabundance of brain matter in the more abstract regions. They would have “leapfrogging loyalties” and neglect the smaller group in favor of the larger group.

“Modern liberals’ defining trait is making a public spectacle of how their loyalties leapfrog over some unworthy folks relatively close to them in favor of other people they barely know.”

Steve Sailer
The Self-Righteous Hive Mind

Given the choice between political policies that will help/harm their tribe and their clan, they will either choose to help the greater tribe at the expense of their own clan or be paralyzed by abstract perfectionism (a common behavior that arises from this trait is “letting the perfect be the enemy of the good”) and therefore ineffective in using their political influence.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to First attempt to describe Koanic’s Mohawk theory

  1. Koanic says:

    You’re translating it into a lower abstraction level.

    It’s a rough draft. Your grand theories take time.

  2. Aeoli Pera says:

    Right, it’s not so much that civilization is degenerate per se, as that it enables all manner of perversions.

    • bicebicebice says:

      >Right, it’s not so much that civilization is degenerate per se, as that it enables all manner of perversions.

      That could be a mathematical equation.

      Too big to fail – Melon warcry.

      Too small to fail – Thal warcry

  3. minwu says:

    “Fauxcippital:
    Empathy group horizon ~ 1
    Political allegiance: Self
    Psychophilosophy: Egoism (“That which is good for me, is good.”)
    Value: Individual virtue”

    Ayn Rand?

    Off topic: Do you think that Aladdin from Magi (Anime) is a Starchild?

  4. Pingback: Amoral familism, generalized to explain Jewish support of Muslim immigration | Aeoli Pera

  5. Mycroft Jones says:

    Talk to Kensuimo. As a fauxippital, your analysis doesn’t quite work. I believe Ken referred to me as “universalist”. He can clarify. Although… what is good for me is if every living being is organized according to a coherent ideology that puts everyone in a good mood, like making a tiger purr. There is a balance in the force; the more selfish you are, the more selfless you have to be to survive.

  6. Pingback: Examples of amoral tribalists, amoral racists, etc. | Aeoli Pera

  7. Pingback: Aeoli’s bowl cut | Aeoli Pera

  8. kensuimo says:

    Bit of a late followup here, but for posterity: Mycroft has considerable prefrontal and frontal in conjunction with his fauxcippital. This helps explain the universalism. As an aside Marc Andreessen has a similar setup, although he seems to have most of his considerable vault height as prefrontal: http://startuptalks.tv/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Screenshot-2014-10-26-19.39.00-720×463.png

    https://s3.amazonaws.com/revue/items/images/002/061/306/original/recode-conf.gif?1497793575

    Caption: I initially thought Marcy Marc had conepar but his gesture here assures me that’s not so. How helpful!

  9. Kensuimo says:

    @Minwu 33:21 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V8QXLJKfFSE

    I couldn’t find good profiles of Rand but this guy is an ardent objectivist. FM.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s