Why women want to have sex with fabulous gay men

It took me a while to figure this one out. But consider:

1) Homosexuals are sexual defectors from the tribal male alliance to do violence for the protection of the tribe’s women and children. (What would they have to gain?)
2) Women desire the winners of male competition, often at the expense of civilization.
3) If a society is reasonably safe then social, intra-tribal competition is more salient than violent, inter-tribal competition. (Ref: CSR theory as applied to human phenotypes.)
4) If one man honors an alliance and another does not (straight and gay, respectively), that makes the former man a cuck and the latter a winner.
5) Therefore, gays men are the pinnacle of male WINNING (at the expense of the greater tribe) in safe, prosperous societies where the group is strong enough to sustain big, fat parasites.
6) Therefore…women in safe, prosperous societies want to have sex with gay men.

This is why we have the instinct to call weak, cowardly men “fags” and vice versa. Our hindbrains are smart, and they know that being a gay man is the deepest form of sexual parasitism.

The conventional wisdom would have us believe that girls are just more comfortable around gay guys, because they implicitly trust each other and have many of the same interests (fashion trends, social conflict, and being as visually attractive as possible). But…as the Alt-Right kids are saying, no girl ever fantasized about being tied up and raped by a nice liberal guy. Women can’t be relaxed and aroused at the same time because their sex drive is triggered by submitting fearfully to a powerful man (don’t the African, hate Africa). So there has to be power imbalance, and this is supplied by the implicit social competitive edge that comes from being part of a tribe of men who only care about each other’s opinions, and couldn’t care less what women think of them.

Finally, straight women love gay men because they are emotionally attracted to the fearlessness and lack of self-consciousness in gay men.

Advertisements

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

38 Responses to Why women want to have sex with fabulous gay men

  1. Ophiuchus says:

    I don’t think women want to go all the way and have actual sex with The Eternal Fag so much as they want to signal that they’re close to and/or affiliated with the Fag Tribe, which is allotted high status in our current, largely ruderal environment. So I think all the mechanisms you describe here are accurate except for #6 (in which case “gay men” can be replaced with “slightly effeminate chads who are adept at signaling that they aren’t h8erz”).

    Womens’ betrayal of men is like a side-to-side/lateral attack vector on the white middle class that occurs simultaneously with the top-down and bottom-up attacks from the upper and lower classes (which are both largely criminal in nature).

    • MM says:

      Agree.
      Also:
      Hatred of faggotry is multi-layered. Methinks the biggest reason we hate them is the hindbrain understands they very much harm tribal fitness. Sure some will have sex with women and may even have kids, but I think the loss of group fitness from weak men who do not fit in well is the ultimate trigger. Also explains why losers get lumped in with fags.
      Did women have the same gay fetish in the past? If they found them disgusting like gammas that would make the most sense imo.

      • Tom Kratman says:

        I don’t know that we would hate them or do, absent modern mores of parading it around, accompanied by rising celebration, in some never-sufficiently-to-be-damned circles, of the kiddy diddlers. For the most part, we”re all very content with not knowing and not thinking about it, in much the same way that we don’t think about mom blowing dad, even though the event is likely to have taken place, and possibly more than once.

        Me; I feel sorry for them. Rather than being “gay,” they’re the most miserable demographic going.

  2. Akuma says:

    “4) If one man honors an alliance and another does not (straight and gay, respectively), that makes the former man a cuck and the latter a winner.”

    This needs to be fleshed out. Any male Ive known that was obsessed with winning over me outside of a sporting event or straight competition was extremely cheap and dishonorable. They viewed me as a threat and that’s why they acted in the rule and law breaking way they did. Like there entire existence revolved around putting me down. It’s a gamma trying to Alpha or Sigma. Once you start poking around youll find out these men are not people you’d want be Allies with if any serious shit went down.

  3. Santoculto says:

    What a garbage coming from a diseased mind

    (((alt right)))+ autism + garbage jewysh “pua” = what could be wrong???

    Sorry but my patience with your delirious posts is finished

    Live with people and your errant creativity maybe become less cretin as this piece of vomit.

    Other trashy hbb blog to stop to visit.

    White slaves can’t help themselves, sad.

  4. Tom Kratman says:

    The theory is interesting but there’s a problem with it, maybe best exemplified by the Theban Sacred Band. They certainly did their part for the tribe. The problem may have a resolution by noting a difference between switch hitters and (you know; maybe there’s no good way to phrase this, as neither straight not pure really work for beans) gays. But it may not either, as the Sacred Band may have been (aha; there’s the word) exclusive gays.

    • Ophiuchus says:

      @Kratman This is why I harp so heavily upon societal scaling/complexity and the thoroughgoing negative effects it has on everybody who is subjected to it. As the scale and complexity of society become greater, and atomization increases, not only do the environmental niches for opportunistic sociological parasites become more voluminous and easily inhabitable, but the incentives and pressure to become such a parasite become all the more inviting and intense.

      The homosexuals of classical Greece formed bands of indispensable, spear-carrying warrior-elites who shed their life’s blood to increase the fitness of their local city-states.

      The homosexuals of our modern, super-scaled globo-homo technocracy form bands of AIDS-carrying cosmopolitan-elites who shed their bodily fluids and morals to decrease the biological and financial fitness of those around them.

      @Santoculto The proprietor of this blergh would genocide both myself and MM’s common genetic group if given the chance, yet we are both among his most vocal supporters. I wouldn’t take anything Aeoli posts too personally, he says what he thinks and thinks what he says. Basically what I’m saying is that you’re going to have to grow a thicker skin, daaarling; it will help you not only in the comments sections of fringe psychology blogs but also life in general.

      Genocide Ref: https://www.phpbb.altrugenics.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=5031#p5031

      TL;DR, name the SCALE

      • Rime says:

        >The homosexuals of our modern, super-scaled globo-homo technocracy form bands of AIDS-carrying cosmopolitan-elites who shed their bodily fluids and morals to decrease the biological and financial fitness of those around them

        Bullshit. Gay greeks only appeared as classical greek civilization went into decline. Athens stopped producing great art and philosophy as they got more invested in boy-fucking, Sparta stopped reproducing great warriors as they went thr way of Athens. No amount of sodomy will create future generations. From Homer ro Herodotus there is no boy-fucking and you see a mighty viral civilization. Shortly after there is no one comparable to Herodotus and you see a lot of boy-fucking and precious little civilization.

        >The proprietor of this blergh would genocide both myself and MM’s common genetic group if given the chance, yet we are both among his most vocal supporters.

        You’re projecting. Thals don’t want to genocide Melons, we just want to be left alone, but you guys can’t do that. We ask you to leave us alone and the next thing we see are a horde of spear chucking testicles chasing us down. What gives? Edenism will die because one of you will get miffed by errant truth telling and sic the horde on us. You support us because you hope to profit from us. Little wonder you chose your name, serpent-bearer, you hope to attach a leech to our throats in order to feed your brood!

        • Ophiuchus says:

          >”No amount of sodomy will create future generations.”

          This is true/obvious, but you’re still missing my point, which is that gayhomos are more manageable, able to be contained and potentially even marshaled into something resembling a productive entity at a lower level of societal scaling and complexity. As these factors increase/scale up, the bubonic buttboys go buck wild, as do various financial and sociological parasites (particularly those in the upper and lower classes which predate upon the middle class; i.e. the productive class).

          >”You’re projecting.”

          No, his words are very clear.

          >”You support us because you hope to profit from us.”

          There’s nothing to profit from, you idiot. The only situation in which Edenism becomes a profitable venture is one in which Edenism becomes popular; i.e. one in which people at large are woke to the Melonboon Menace, which doesn’t put my future societal standing in a very good position, now does it? The juice of “profiting” from Edenism wouldn’t be worth half the squeeze.

          There are a million and one ways to turn a shady profit in this modern high-tech anarcho-tyrannic jungle environment, and fucking Edenism isn’t one of them. I’m interested in Edenism because itz incredibly interesting to me, I think it contains a ton of explicative truth and I enjoy theorizing about it for the sake of doing so, which you would know if you were a typed member of the forum, but you’re not a typed member of the forum, now are you? You’re just a casual in the comments section of an exterior, tertiary blog. Go fuck yourself.

          “Us”, said the comments section casual. Top kek.

          • Rime says:

            >The juice of “profiting” from Edenism wouldn’t be worth half the squeeze.

            Am I talking about $ or am I talking about loosh?

            >I enjoy theorizing about it for the sake of doing so, which you would know if you were a typed member of the forum, but you’re not a typed member of the forum, now are you?

            I assume you post under one handle and one handle only? And like most people, you assume most people are generally like yourself?

        • Tom Kratman says:

          This is probably not true, especially not among the Dorians and related Cretans, where pederasty was common apparently from a very early time. The evidence, in any case, seems to begin in pre-classical times, before they started their decay. (Let one bit of evidence do for now, Ganymede. When your gods are pederastic butt pirates, butt piracy starts early.)

        • MM says:

          Edenism will die because of mentally ill freaks like you Rime. Don’t worry about being left alone- you will be that way the rest of your pathetic life.

      • Son of Distant Trebizond says:

        Yep, I find it hard to credit the Fighting Thebans and the obligate bumsplitters of today as aspects of the same phenomenon.

      • Rime says:

        Look man, I want to like you, but fuck! We will never really get along. I’ll leave you to your river-based civiliizations and your pyramids and I’ll stick to riding woolly rhinos and herding mammoths across the steppe. Hail Hyperborea! and all that

        Stay white my friends.

        • Ophiuchus says:

          Well now I feel kind of bad for my earlier comment, but the original comment thread was a A-B conversation between me, Kratman, and buttmaster Santo Claus, which you then interjected yourself into. I believe you are familiar with the rest of the expression.

          • Rime says:

            Your comment didn’t hurt and was a necessary check. I’m like Tex, what remains of those receptors is rapidly burning out. There is a lot to be gained from hanging around this sphere, whether it comes from Thals, Boons or Sturchildrenz.

            >I believe you are familiar with the rest of the expression.

            Engrish is not my first language. Please, do tell.

      • Tom Kratman says:

        That seems more a local cultural distinction than a scaling- or complexity-based one. If our society and culture are rotten, and they are, this may account entirely for the difference between gays then and now.

      • Koanic says:

        > The proprietor of this blergh would genocide both myself and MM’s common genetic group if given the chance

        He has a point. Melon psychological architecture is one of the suite of scale-enabling technologies driving the sadistically slow extinction of the human soul. His enginerd’s neck would be up on the chopping block afterwards.

        • Ophiuchus says:

          No disagreement re: the psychological suite, but I think the better solution is to take things on a case-by-case basis rather than just liquify everyone. I would even go so far as to extend this policy to Der Juden (aka the Satanic Earthly Strike Team). They contain a lot of valuable Edenic DNA that has been selected for relatively recently to maximize their group’s evilness and inhumanity. In a way they’re kind of like an ongoing slush fund of the human race’s Edenic bloodlines that has been sucking up and absorbing any high quality strain of DNA it encounters over the years. I think some intense culling + psycho-social rehabilitation would work absolute wonders for both them and us gentiles alike. Not that that’s going to happen without ITZ happening, but still. A nigger can dream.

          Also
          >enginerd

          Kek

          • Koanic says:

            That is the idea of neospartanism, yes. Perhaps we’d need both apocalypse trifecta cull and neospartanism to avoid getting eaten by digital life.

      • MM says:

        > The proprietor of this blergh would genocide both myself and MM’s common genetic group if given the chance, yet we are both among his most vocal supporters.

        Was a year ago so will assume he got over his rage at melons and existence itself but damn…

        Very disappointing.

        • Ophiucuck says:

          I largely attribute the #rage to lifegrind stress. We all have dark times. I see us as having the potential to turn over a new leaf, especially with your new blergh giving advice on how to overcome the lifegrind and whatnot.

          I think that making nice, *working together* and turning over the aforementioned new leaf is not only essential, but indeed will prove to be the only way forward out of our current technocratic scalehell. I think your blog has been exemplary in this regard.

  5. Rime says:

    >no girl ever fantasized about being tied up and raped by a nice liberal guy

    Believe what you want, in every nice liberal is a self loathing communist sadist screaming to get out.

    We hate fags because they prey on our sons, it is that simple. If queers didn’t eat our kids we would let them fuck and suck in a great big pile. Of course they always need new boyz -ahem- bodies to add to the pile so…

    On a side note has anyone noticed that the animated Joker is the definitive aspiepath? This explains his compelling character – he is true to life.

    • Ophiuchus says:

      Also this

      Also HP will always be definitive Aspiepath

      • Rime says:

        Who is HP? I googled it and I don’t think a printer can be an aspiepath. Did you mean Harry James Potter? He’s just a boring prog Jeebus wannabe. Frodo is infinitely superior. Took an a blade to the gut and a bite to the hand, both unhealable wounds. This man knows what pain is. Harry Asshole wakes up alive and full of feminist vigor casting Voldemort into hell for being mean. That’s not even a sin that’s just beinf realistic! God bless Tolkien, may the Church recognize his sainthood one day.

        • Ophiuchus says:

          Lovecraft. He is the ur-Aspiepath not only because of his phrenology, but also his psychology (seeing science as an unfolding drama, myth-weaving; etc).

          • Pseudorandom Bypasser says:

            Speaking of aspiepaths, how come Valerie Solanas hasn’t been mentioned anywhere in the Edenosphere? She’s got that chin big time. Otherwise her face looks like a disfigured amud front. Digging her background there’s definitely amygdala damage.

          • Rime says:

            Thanks. Is it possible that an Aspiepath might have a cleft chin?

  6. It might just be that women will have sex with whomever theyre told to have sex with => basically point 2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s