It took me a while to figure this one out. But consider:
1) Homosexuals are sexual defectors from the tribal male alliance to do violence for the protection of the tribe’s women and children. (What would they have to gain?)
2) Women desire the winners of male competition, often at the expense of civilization.
3) If a society is reasonably safe then social, intra-tribal competition is more salient than violent, inter-tribal competition. (Ref: CSR theory as applied to human phenotypes.)
4) If one man honors an alliance and another does not (straight and gay, respectively), that makes the former man a cuck and the latter a winner.
5) Therefore, gays men are the pinnacle of male WINNING (at the expense of the greater tribe) in safe, prosperous societies where the group is strong enough to sustain big, fat parasites.
6) Therefore…women in safe, prosperous societies want to have sex with gay men.
This is why we have the instinct to call weak, cowardly men “fags” and vice versa. Our hindbrains are smart, and they know that being a gay man is the deepest form of sexual parasitism.
The conventional wisdom would have us believe that girls are just more comfortable around gay guys, because they implicitly trust each other and have many of the same interests (fashion trends, social conflict, and being as visually attractive as possible). But…as the Alt-Right kids are saying, no girl ever fantasized about being tied up and raped by a nice liberal guy. Women can’t be relaxed and aroused at the same time because their sex drive is triggered by submitting fearfully to a powerful man (don’t the African, hate Africa). So there has to be power imbalance, and this is supplied by the implicit social competitive edge that comes from being part of a tribe of men who only care about each other’s opinions, and couldn’t care less what women think of them.
Finally, straight women love gay men because they are emotionally attracted to the fearlessness and lack of self-consciousness in gay men.