New rule: to comment at da blergh you must be interesting or endearing. I will not spend my patience on tolerating condescension from midwits. (The spirit of this rule may migrate to the forum soon in another form, but I’m going to consult Koanic about the changes I want to make there.)
Now then, let the hate flow through you!
If you think understanding something is the same as knowing a lot of things about it…you might be a midwit.
If somebody says “good morning” at 12:10 PM and you correct them…you might be a midwit.
If you think having a lot of citations means your opinions are correct…you might be a midwit.
If you can’t tell the difference between necessary and sufficient conditions…you might be a midwit.
If you think statistics, data, and evidence are the same thing…you might be a midwit.
If you think PhDs are a sign of high intelligence…you might be a midwit.
If you think philosophy is easier than engineering…you might be a midwit.
If you think genius is brilliance, and brilliance is just very fast mental computation…you might be a midwit.
If you believe the singularity is possible because consciousness is just emanations of electrical signals doing logic in the brain…you might be a midwit.
If you think smart people prefer to use big words…you might be a midwit.