The Manichean dialectic

The Manichean dialectic is my term for a common social engineering technique used to shift cultural values. The name and concept are inspired by the Manichean heresy and Hegelian dialectic. It exploits pre-existing dual-axis political cycles like the Pyrrhic cycle which are fated to continual realignments, and often induces large-scale disasters, wars, and mass die-offs.

To begin with, consider the common use of Hegelian dialectic as a political hack by an elite political class. The class is split into a thesis and antithesis, Democrats and Republicans in America, who apparently hold contradictory views. However, they secretly agree on the things they care about, immigration policy and Israel, while making a fuss over dramatic issues they don’t care about like abortion and education. The differences become irrelevant over time as the effects of the unopposed synthesis grow to dominate. In the layman’s idiom, “the only time Democrats and Republicans will work together is when it’s to stab Americans in the back”.

However, a situation like this is unstable because the nature of social engineering is to disempower and discomfort other potential political actors, which has the effect of provoking a realignment. The election of Donald Trump was a fantastic example, where right-wingers shifted from lawful good to lawful evil and left-wingers shifted from lawful evil to chaotic evil. This indicates we are in the Age of Decadence in the figure below, with the Alt-Right occupying the bottom-left position, Antifa occupying the bottom-right position, and normies occupying the middle between them (and shifted slightly upward toward the center).

In order for a long-term cultural shift to occur, the synthesis must survive the realignment. In the modern scenario, the common elements between the Alt-Right and Antifa is irreligiosity (measured by religious attendance) and a realignment from the Liberty-Oppression moral axis to the Care-Harm moral axis (Who? Whom?), and socialism by extension. Hopefully this helps you to understand my recent insistence on charity, and my rage against the new religion of race which is a perversion of the natural order. This is where the Manichean dialectic shines: it exploits a dynamic bait-and-switch. The moral axes will shift again, but the new religious value will remain and we will be that much closer to the revival of Zodiacism.

Mathematically, the two-axis dialectic may be compared to a conical helix.

spiral22

Spiral_Sink_VF

The x and y factors diminish in importance as t increases and the system approaches the synthesis along the z-axis. This hack relies on the tendency of human politics to binary thinking and thus can exploit any dual feedback system, with the Pyrrhic cycle being only one example, by Framing the opposing elements and common element into existence. Preach to schoolchildren long enough and loud enough that left-right means Communist-Nazi, and pretty soon everybody’s going to agree on socialism but disagree about whether Jews or Aryans should be on top.

Another good example you may consider is the increasing narcissism in men and women, and the “invade the world, invite the world” paradox. As I’ve previously explained, globalism is the psychological manifestation of the narcissistic urge to weaken the distinctions between humans. But the masculine impulse is to push through the other’s boundaries whereas the feminine impulse is to pull the other through the boundaries. They disagree on invading versus inviting but they agree on the need to cross boundaries, i.e. globalism. Therefore, we expect that the Manichean dialectic preferred by globalists has been to support any development that increases narcissism.

I’ve noticed several symbolic representations of this in philosophy, art, and culture. The yin-yang symbol stands out as the most obvious, and by extension Cancer in astrology (and probably hermetic Zodiacism).

yin-yang

cancerglyphtitle

In art I’ve noticed this idea is often represented aesthetically by a vortex.

Admit it, after all the self-improvement posting you were wondering if I could still put out shit like this. Just cuz’ I done got me a grownup job don’t mean I ain’t no jenious no more :-P.

Advertisements

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

38 Responses to The Manichean dialectic

  1. everlastingphelps says:

    The dialectical way of demonstrating that the greatest overall good would be for the alt-(Christian)west to overtake the alt-Riech for control of the alt-right.

    We have enough red pills. We need more bread-pills like Jordan Peterson.

  2. O_P_H_I_U_C_U_C_K says:

    finally_a_dank_post.exe.jpg.rar

    You can’t really grok the significance of the dialectic in a semantic/symbolic sense (rather than a visuospatial/mechanical sense as you’ve done here) without first grokking Steiner’s Lucifer and Ahriman concepts (NB it is essential to reiterate and drive the point home that when we say “Luciferian” here we don’t mean the Gnosti-shit religious belief system based upon literally worshipping Lucifer but very specifically in the Steinerian sense as outlined here: https://sites.google.com/site/luciferandahriman/ ).
    In a more thermo-scienmagistical sense Lucifer and Ahriman respectively map to excessive prolonged heat and excessive prolonged cold (alternatively you could think of ASoIaF’s “R’Hllor” for Lucifer and “The Great Other” for Ahriman). Vejiortan calls Ahriman “Saturn” and Lucifer “Luzifer”, but from what I understand he’s basically describing roughly the same dynamics/spiritual epiphenomena that Steiner was (you two also seem to be largely on the same track intellectually; you just disagree on the Jehovah Question).

    Also in your Overwatch concept, the psycho-spiritual essence of each level/class of the pyramid scheme switches off between Lucifer and Ahriman as you climb up, culminating with their synthesis at the top.

    1. Le Friendly Autistic Warden Man (Synthesis)
    2. Alchemists (Could Go Either Way)
    3. Game Theorists (Luciferian)
    4. Mercenarialists (Ahrimanic)
    5/6. Politicians/Pentagonalists (Luciferian) [Hermeticism/Occultism Begins Here]
    7. Technocrats (Ahrimanic)
    8. Demagogues (Luciferian)
    9. Artisans (Ahrimanic)
    10. Neurotics (Luciferian)
    11. Middle Class (Ahrimanic)
    12. Proles (Luciferian)

    I added two new classes: the Mercenarialist business-elite/executive class (as well as Deep State political consultants and whatnot) which is full of people like Rex Tillerson and Dick Cheney as well as ruthless amoral pseudo-foreigner strivers (not to mention turbo-Jew knifemen like Steve Mnuchin) and the Pentagonalist military command class, which is full of owl melons and MTs like HR McMaster as well as various Zionist assets. Note also that Pentagonalists exists at the same authority level as Politicians; both take their orders from Mercenarialists who in turn receive their orders from Game Theorist tru-aristocrats (mostly Jews and full Melons and often both like our good friend Roffschild). These two new classes also satisfy the “Muh number 12” aesthetic we find in the Abrahamic religions while also preserving the Leapfrog Identity rule.

    Also Aeoli is your astrological sign Cancer?

    • O_P_H_I_U_C_U_C_K says:

      Also Mercenarialists are mainly Pig Melons, which is a type that I believe Owl came up with but I’ve also noticed. They’re mainly concerned with business, finance and making dat $krilla in general. They have high IQs, low AH and very low psychoticism. Similar to snake melons, their main redeeming quality is a good sense of humor, though they’re less sensualistic and prestige/politics-driven and have more straightforward and “matter of fact” personalities in general. Their main concern in life is building businesses, making investments, making good deals and acquiring more dosh to make more investments, build more businesses and make more good deals. They are good evidence of Koanic’s boar-raping-dolphin theory.

      List of Pig Melons:
      Rush Limbaugh (archetypical, comes complete w/ cigar to chomp)
      Karl Rove (archetypical, cigar sold separately)
      Dick Cheney
      Jack Welch
      Putin (socket depth)
      Alex Jones (Bigeye Intermediate)
      Steve Ballmer (socket depth, otherwise archetypical)
      Stephen Hemsley
      The God Emperor (socket depth, light snake admixture)
      David M. Cote
      Gerald Ford

      If you go through a list of high-ranking business executives, they’re everywhere. They’re similar to CBS phenotypically, but less people-oriented and spergy and more money-oriented and greedy. In Andediluvian times, this would have been the mercantile class.

      • O_P_H_I_U_C_U_C_K says:

        Also h/t Heavyguy for the name “Pentagonalist”

        • O_P_H_I_U_C_U_C_K says:

          Also if you stack the Overwatch hierarchy linearly (rather than pyramidally/by population distribution) and have Pentagonalists (Military/hard power elite/Moldbug’s Red Team/”masculine-projecting narcissism impulse”) and Politicians (Government/soft power elite/Moldbug’s Blue Team/”feminine-absorbing narcissism impulse”) at the same authority level it roughly resembles the Christian cross.

          Except in the right hand you now have the sword of the Lightbringer (Pentagonalists) and in the left hand you now have the pen of the Serpent (Politicians). I tentatively think this is a corruption of Michael and Gabriel and their respective roles and a deliberate attempt at mockery against God by the autist-in-chief. In a broader sense, this is essentially what mass/global society itself is: a mockery against God (though fortunately attempting to mock God tends not to work out particularly well for the one doing the mocking).

          /pol/ The Bible was right again!”

          Alternatively, I could just be high out of my mind on woo and rambling incoherently.

      • Pseudorandom Bypasser says:

        >They have high IQs, low AH and very low psychoticism.

        Putin kinda breaks the last two. Is it the socket depth and slavishness? Going on a tangent here, it seems like psychotic spectrum disorders are more common in Eastern Europe and people of EE origin. Generational trauma, nutritional issues or something else? Worth studying.

        Also, Finnish police chief Seppo Kolehmainen looks like one.

        Mads Mikkelsen looks like a Pig-MT intermediate.

        https://i.chzbgr.com/original/7982830848/h8567AC9C/

        Neil Dudgeon is a third one. Not sure how much his role as John Barnaby reflects his real personality.

        My examples and perception of their typical personality doesn’t really fit yours. Maybe there are separate introverted and extraverted Pig Melons. The introverted ones (or at least the characters they play) seem to have wider AHs and possibly also higher psychoticism. As the original coiners of Pig Melon said, they (among with owls) are the melons closest to MTs. They seem to have and edge on them in their ability to command, appear dominant, navigate hierarchies and perceive social matters. They must also be slightly more mentally fluid. Socially or psychologically focused doubt seems to be their essential characteristic, as their physiognomy and expression show. They also display the typical melon “knowing more than letting out” vibe. Maybe the introverted ones direct their socially focused doubt and insight into starchild-like hierarchy navigation, organizational matters and practical problem solving including social matters, while the extraverted ones do those to world at large, producing a psychology closer to your examples. Then again most of them seem to lack the distinct proboscis nose, which used to be their defining feature along with socket depth. Point is, as M-fronts even the introverted ones don’t reach MT-like detail and object focus. I mean, there’s a difference between having intuition in atomic-level vs. technical concept-level vs. physical and social surroundings-level matters.

      • Pseudorandom Bypasser says:

        By the way, what about the big guy Kim Dotcom? He could also be an MT with fat obscuring his socket depth and other facial features, but his personality seems somewhat non-MT. He seems like a big kid that happens to have a lot of money. I bet he’s a medium-to-high functioning psychopath with enough intelligence and money to mostly keep or bail himself out of trouble. That could also explain his obesity via deficient impulse control. He also has a somewhat Tarantinian weirdo look.

        • Ophiucuck says:

          >”Putin kinda breaks the last two. Is it the socket depth and slavishness?”

          I suspect so. Though you shouldn’t forget that despite his outward reticence/introversion Putin is still essentially a gangster boss who lives in a $1 Billion mega-mansion.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putin%27s_Palace

          >”My examples and perception of their typical personality doesn’t really fit yours. Maybe there are separate introverted and extraverted Pig Melons.”

          This probably holds true for Pigs, as it does with all humans. Then of course you have mixtures of introversion and extraversion like me who have an extraverted locus of cognition (that is, an external focus of mental energy or “a kind of penetrating vision” as Jung put it) but who simultaneously lose energy and are drained by interacting with and being around other people (for the opposite of this, see Koanic, who seems to be energized by hanging out and shitposting with other thought criminals on Gab, but whose locus of cognition/mental energy is clearly internally-directed/endogenous. Then you have folks like Aeoli who are introverted both in an energy-transfer sense and a cognitive-locus sense).

          Koanic and Aeoli are both “INTJs” in MBTI terms, but their minds are clearly different (as all human minds ultimately are). I think there’s a difference between an “Intuitive-Thinking” type like Koanic (I call him an “Intuitive-Thinking” type because he utilizes his secondary extraverted-thinking/logical systemizing function very heavily with stuff like the original Phrenological system and later his Cyborganize exomind project) and a “Deep-Intuitive” type like Aeoli (whose psychology is dominated by a visionary inner-nature which manifests as a kind “feeling” or aesthetic “sensation” in Jung’s terms; “If it feels good, it is good,” in Aeoli’s terms; and unlike Koanic his external-thinking auxiliary function is more toned down and limited to building spreadsheets and whatnot categorizing the mysterious depths of manboon emotions). I think this difference comes down to Edenic craniological/possibly phrenological features i.e. Occ-vs-M-Back

          Sorry for the tangent lol.

          >”The introverted ones (or at least the characters they play) seem to have wider AHs and possibly also higher psychoticism.”

          Probably so. But their focus/motivating factor in life tends to remain decidedly slanted toward material gain from what I’ve observed, which lead me to my assumption regarding low psychoticism (it may be necessary to further disambiguate between AH and psychoticism when getting a feel for the Pig archetype’s overall essence/personality). They tend to have relatively small “facial humanity” in Koanic’s terminology. (i.e. despite Karl Rove’s large braincase/cranium, his face seems kind of small when compared to the overall size of his dome.)

          >”Point is, as M-fronts even the introverted ones don’t reach MT-like detail and object focus.”

          Few do. Lol.

          “I mean, there’s a difference between having intuition in atomic-level vs. technical concept-level vs. physical and social surroundings-level matters.”

          Yep

          • Ophiucuck says:

            TL;DR watch this video and tell me this man isn’t part-pig (protip: you can’t)

            So, known Pig Melonboon traits that I’ve noticed:

            -Greedy
            -Funny/Humorous
            -High IQ, but materialistic ($$$) rather than idealistic focus
            -Strong leadership traits/personalities; strong team-building drive/clear and efficient thinking unclouded by psychoticism and whatnot
            -Somatotypically Endomorphic/powerfully-built/”big-boned” (similar to CBS)
            -Broad forehead/frontal (again similar to CBS)
            -High testosterone; male pattern baldness (once again similar to CBS)
            -“Bulb” head is common though not standard (see also Marc Andresson and Voltaire though Voltaire doesn’t really fit the Pig archetype)
            -Overall Piggish physical appearance

            Politically, they tend to vote Republican and support Conservative policy (often Neo-Conservative policy); they along with the elite Zionists are a big part of the money behind the Iraq warz (and consequently did a lot of the profiteering off them as in the case of Halliburton CEO and known pigman Dick Cheney).

            Their Neocon Mercenarialist cucking of the American voter echoes the behavior of the savage boar cucking the gentle bonobo oh-so-many years ago…

            https://web.archive.org/web/20150905192250/http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/2015/08/31/boar-raped-bonobo-first-human-the-horrifying-implications/

          • Pseudorandom Bypasser says:

            >I suspect so. Though you shouldn’t forget that despite his outward reticence/introversion Putin is still essentially a gangster boss who lives in a $1 Billion mega-mansion.

            Yes. Again a good proof of him being a melon. By the way, keep in mind that antisocial behavior is just another version of high AH.

            >Sorry for the tangent lol.

            It was good, and I’ve noticed/thought about the same. Those paragraphs would have much to analyze but because I’d drain my scarce mental energy and comment space, I’ll just comment some random bits.

            >for the opposite of this, see Koanic, who seems to be energized by hanging out and shitposting with other thought criminals on Gab, but whose locus of cognition/mental energy is clearly internally-directed/endogenous

            While I get what you mean, that’s still pretty introverted and intellectual. In the genewarp post Koanic remarked how he gets his meatspace social stimulation and overstimulation pretty quickly. Isn’t it already pretty much set in stone that M-backs are mainly focused on external/social reality, and thus in things like sparring or teaming around some pursuit or competition e.g. at Gab? T-front Koanic just expresses this in an introverted way. A T-back would be more interested in hitting the books and at most communicating what he’s learned. Their differences in bonding can be understood via their adaptations to modern large scale social reality / sociopolitical arena vs. autistic small tribe.

            I think that M-back/parietal produces a, should I say, perceptual extraversion. While their cognition can be introverted/aspie, they still focus it to processing externally oriented/relevant information. Things like deepsock, Aspergers and intelligence modify this. See the typical MT academic or technocrat as an example. No matter how introverted and intellectual, they likely still keep seeing things as a landscape to navigate and manage instead of a pure abstraction to simply study and look around at. This is also why I predict that a deepsocket/aspie MT makes a better cyber wiz than a TT one. Check this out: https://aeolipera.wordpress.com/2017/09/15/a-more-precise-definition-of-intuition/#comment-11323 . It might explain a lot if you have the mind to make the necessary intuitive leaps.

            >Koanic and Aeoli are both “INTJs” in MBTI terms, […] i.e. Occ-vs-M-Back

            Yup. Don’t forget their IQ difference (>135 vs. >145). A +3SD Aeoli would have better reasoning, crystallized intelligence, focus and superior creative output, a +2SD Koanic would be closer to a “meat calculator” with less AH, psychoticism, aestheticism and general nerdiness. Their bottlenecks are different. [See https://aeolipera.wordpress.com/2017/09/30/archetype-spiraling/#comment-11951 ] The archetypal INTJ is definitely an MT. I think that INTJ cognitive functions map pretty differently to TTs and MTs. Some applicable speculation here: https://aeolipera.wordpress.com/2017/07/03/speculations-on-higher-functions-in-koanics-mohawk/#comment-10113 . In terms of visual metaphors, Aeoli’s intuition is closer to freely feeling objects in a bucket of muddied water, while Koanic’s is closer to a clear water flowing in a detailed but nevertheless limited pipe system.

            Regarding your other comment and Pig trait list, agree. I mostly have a problem with how most of your examples lack the proboscis nose, looking more like goblins or bats. Otherwise their faces do have a pig-like look, yes. Their physiognomy and psychology kinda resembles some degenerated platonic form of an old times self-made colonialist-frontierman tycoon patriarch. Scrooge McDuck and Flintheart Glomgold are good fictional examples.

            Maybe commies really were into something.


            • Ophiucuck says:

              >”Isn’t it already pretty much set in stone that M-backs are mainly focused on external/social reality, and thus in things like sparring or teaming around some pursuit or competition e.g. at Gab?”

              Yes, that’s my understanding. I think it has to do with unconscious self-awareness (and consequently, unconscious other-awareness, which I have an effortpost on in the inner forum). I think this self-awareness leads to the mind subconsciously building a socially-adaptive ego-construct out of archetypical memes and symbols and complexes and doo-dads and whatnot (see Aeoli’s “archetype spiraling”). This ego-construct is primarily built (informed) by a combination of ancestral-genetic memory latent in the mind and external, consciously-experienced information/memory/life events (and made more rich/potent/spiritually powerful with “Edenic outlier” genetic expression).

              This juxtaposition of high self-awareness with a relative lack of social fluidity gives rise to the stereotypically-intense, “tightly wound”, and shall we say, perhaps in the spirit of your own mien, Stannis-id MT personality. We see this internally manifested in the “MT Code”, which I would guess begins to develop in the unconscious mind during early puberty as a result of the conscious mind realizing, to its horror, that its inbuilt social-signaling mechanisms are somehow “off” (i.e. maladapted/miscalibrated to the current Entropy-Disharmonized-Rudero-SCALE social environment).

              This gives rise to the increased logico-externalized-thinking (logical-systemizing of external environmental data; “Te-auxiliary” in Jungian/MemeBTI terms) tendencies, which when combined with psychoticism, have often-brilliant results such as the original phrenological system; I expect Koanic’s Cyborganize project to yield similar results.

              Speaking of which, the aesthetic equivalent of Koanic’s Cyborganize “Exomind” would be the title character of Vampire Hunter D’s “Left Hand”, which is an external consciousness that is “separate” from D, and yet symbiotically and organically linked with him (a sort of “Exomind”, if you will). The “Left Hand”, in contrast to D, is an extraverted jokester who gives him the magical powers he needs to put him on equal footing with his presumably full-melon vampire adversaries, whose “magical power” is intrinsic. The Left Hand’s powers include such abilities as “Success Powers” and “Atmosphere Adaption” (as in “social atmosphere adaption”).

              http://vampirehunterd.wikia.com/wiki/Left_Hand

              ^I’ve only glossed over a few pages of that wiki, and have never watched any of the Vampire Hunter D animu-manga, but what little I’ve read comes off almost like someone who was Eden-pilled attempting to write a semi-satirical work of the “MT Archetype”.

              >I think that M-back/parietal produces a, should I say, perceptual extraversion. While their cognition can be introverted/aspie, they still focus it to processing externally oriented/relevant information.

              Yep. We can see this difference manifest in the numerous other properties that characterize the parietal-occipital divide as well, such as relative-vs-absolute spatial sense for each, respectively.

              >The archetypal INTJ is definitely an MT.

              I agree, and even made a heavily autistic post on the inner Altrugenics forum that makes an early attempt at mapping phrenological/cranial features to Jungian psychological functions. One of the findings (using the celebritytypes.com “INTJ” section for muh sample) was that INTJ tends toward a combination Thal-front and Parietal/Fauxccipital back (eg Nietzsche, Isaac Newton, Bobby Fischer; etc, though T-backs also aren’t uncommon). Intredastingly, we see INTJ’s “opposite” type (in functional-arrangement terms), ENTP, has a lot more melonhead (or “large-group-adapted”, if you like) expression, with folks like Voltaire, Francis Galton and David Hume.

              Though I think that MBTI itself is an incredibly limited system and is best understood as introductory material to Jungian psychology proper (IMO even just Jung’s “Psychological Types” by itself blows the entire MBTI-sphere out of the water and is a dramatically/qualitatively superior expression of the actual ideas that the MBTI attempts to systemize, and in so doing, sacrifices via compression the gist of what Jung was even talking about). Also, contra Aeoli, who is apparently a Freud enthusiast, I think Jung blows Freud the fuck out of the water, too (though I haven’t read enough Freud to say that with much confidence).

              >”In terms of visual metaphors, Aeoli’s intuition is closer to freely feeling objects in a bucket of muddied water, while Koanic’s is closer to a clear water flowing in a detailed but nevertheless limited pipe system.”

              This is one of the better analogies I’ve heard characterizing this particular lobular divide.

            • Ophiucuck says:

              Also

              >”Their physiognomy and psychology kinda resembles some degenerated platonic form of an old times self-made colonialist-frontierman tycoon patriarch. Scrooge McDuck and Flintheart Glomgold are good fictional examples.”

              ^Yes, well put. I see them kind of as the spiritual/genetic successors of the Tammany Hall tradition back east and the boomtown tycoon custom out west. Tophats, cigars and greed.

              >”By the way, what about the big guy Kim Dotcom?… I bet he’s a medium-to-high functioning psychopath with enough intelligence and money to mostly keep or bail himself out of trouble. That could also explain his obesity via deficient impulse control. He also has a somewhat Tarantinian weirdo look.”

              I wouldn’t necessarily call him a full-on psychopath; he apparently has a wife and three kids. This family-building behavior is not what actual, legit psychopaths like Jimmy Saville are known for getting into (the word “psychopath” gets thrown around a bit loosely in these parts anyway, and in many if not most cases could serve as a placeholder-term for “person whose psycho-emotional complexity and resultant actions lie outside of the spectrum of what I am equipped to instinctively or easily comprehend”), but there are clearly some gremlins running around in his basement, so to speak. If I had to guess just from instinctive diagnosis I’d say he’s got some weird sexual complexes built up to match his quasi-childish personality, poor impulse-control and Finno-Tarantinid (food fedish :DD XDp) physiognomy. Edenically, he’s hard to get an initial read on to due to fat obscuring the diagnostico-magistical aspects of his face (socket depth etc). So maybe MT-shifted pig melon?

  3. Mycroft Jones says:

    Christianity prevents holiness spirals by calling people Judaizers, if they can’t first convince them to castrate themselves in monasteries, or even off themselves by serving the needy in leper colonies. The Judaizers are those who said “hell no I’m not going to live a sexless life, and not going to kill myself with other peoples poz, just for some fake ideas about charity and chastity.”

  4. Zoronn says:

    This post is vaguer than some of your others. What is the new religion of race?

    How is the left-right polarization in schools getting everyone to agree on socialism with the debate being about Jews or Aryans on top? In socialist countries there are behind the scenes controllers but also lots of representation or direct rule by non-Jews or non-Aryans.

    You say the new religious value will remain after moral axes shift. Which religious value is this? And it leads to Zodiacism and this is bad? You’re a Christian so aside from pre-existing biases what reason do you oppose a religion that situates one within the stars and focuses on elevating consciousness to greater heights of cosmic and personal unity?

    This would have been similar to the Ancient Greeks. It is more worthwhile to return to this.

    The Atlantean Restoration, with a return to constructing cosmically aligned pyramids to channel pranic energy, and a culture run by aristocratic cultural preservationist sorcerers breeding for spiritual evolution is the right way to go. So says Zoronn.

  5. Edenist Whackjob says:

    Stop sperging. Start moving toward becoming a highly paid contract coder. Logical career path. Focus.

    Better the harsh rebuke of a friend than the kisses of an enemy, etc.

    • Mycroft Jones says:

      Do you have experience in this department and willing to advise? Please contact me on the forum.

      • Edenist Whackjob says:

        No. Swine, jewellery, etc.

        • Aeoli Pera says:

          Be nice, I like Mycroft.

          • Mycroft Jones says:

            Nice to know where people stand. Thanks Aeoli.

            • Aeoli Pera says:

              For that matter, I like Edenist Whackjob a lot too. I think his malice is misdirected from the forum’s sins to you, hence the response. We will fix.

            • Edenist Whackjob says:

              Yes, Aeoli is correct. Mycroft can email me and I’ll help.

            • bicebicebice says:

              Whackjob was more chill when he was a dickpumper just saying tho the code-shilling rubbed off on me, itz so easy you feel stupid. Learn it from home and get a bluepilled wagecuck job working for the local goobernment impressing 50-60year old hags with your 1337 input/output open/close skillz. So easy you can learn it from home.

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWPMSSsVdPk + http://www.transaction.net/web/tutor/cmdtable.html

              have fun.

            • Edenist Whackjob says:

              bice: yes but step it up a level and become a contract coder so you’re at least paid market rate for it. Normie employed coding gig in Sweden might pay you 35k SEK ($50k for you muricans) whereas you get effectively twice that as a contractor (at least)…. LOTS of bloat in employed gigs, although the effort required is a bit lower also.

        • bicebicebice says:

          What program do you use to document what you are doing, Word? do you think html is a good easy start? i mean everybody has notepad on their computers.

          I used http://www.httrack.com/ to rip just any article of friatider to see what they looked like in notepad and boy thats a lot of shit…its all in one big chunk in a row, looks like ass. im probably doing it all wrong, but how can a human being work in this workspace?–>http://clip2net.com/s/3OAYMrR is that web 2.0? it looks like a lot of something to create a very little of nothing, just one article on a page.

          “why are you asking me this?” is this what optimized peak performance looks like? it just looks like shit to me inb4 thats what its supposed to look like. isn’t the shitty one better? http://clip2net.com/s/3OAZib4

          What do you think?

          • Edenist Whackjob says:

            I would use Sublime Text 3. And I would start with HTML/CSS, followed by basic Javascript. Possibly PHP if you see yourself being more of a back-ender.

            • bicebicebice says:

              Thanks, I think i grasped the basic concepts pretty much already, create a body fill it with functions and content etc, webpages that is.

            • Edenist Whackjob says:

              You’re on the right track! Aeoli should maybe write-up all this advice in a post?

  6. Jana- says:

    whats your job aeoli and how old are you?

  7. Mr. T. says:

    Somewhat on topic:
    THE SHIFT OF THE AGES, CHAPTER 20: PROPHETIC TIME CYCLES
    https://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/books-free-online/18-the-shift-of-the-ages/76-the-shift-of-the-ages-chapter-20-prophetic-time-cycles

    History, time, cycles, pyramids!

  8. Ophiucuck says:

    Also Aeoli gr8 OP poast in its own right. “There’s that spiral again”.

    Also regarding moral re-alignments, narcissism, and dual-feedback systems (like the Pyrrhic Cycle) the Lightbringer’s sword can be, in woo terms, likened to a penis (the spiritual characteristics and role of the Lightbringer/Lawbringer within the Glubb/Pyrrhic Cycle coincide directly with the “urge to push through others’ boundaries” that characterizes “masculine-tinged narcissism”). In concomitant woo terms, the Serpent’s pen (or tongue) can be likened to a clitoris (and the Invite-Invade paradox’s feminine aspect, “the urge to pull others through your own boundaries”).

    The penis and clitoris are both the center of autoerotic physical pleasure (whose psychological counterpart is narcissism) in each respective human gender (gender itself being a binary phenomenon like the Thesis and Antithesis of the Hegelian/Manichaean Dialectic). https://truthxchange.com/2000/09/androgyny-the-pagan-sexual-ideal/

    All this stuff with dualistic grand cycles and masculinity and femininity and whatnot probably have quite a bit to do with the Egyptian Hermetic Mystery Religion (Hermes himself being the father of Hermaphroditus). We can see stuff like the infinity symbol/lemniscate on the Pharaonic headwear as pictured here:

  9. Pingback: Compiled tech career advice from comments | Aeoli Pera

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s