Culture war, part 2

Part 1. That’s one of my top five posts.

Immediately following Martin Luther’s broadside assault on the moral authority of the Roman Catholic Church, the Copernican revolution sapped its epistemological authority. The “one true church” had largely brought this on itself through a gnostic hubris common to insular elites, asserting that its privileged connection to God gave the Pope and his cadre the power of God to define physical reality through pure affirmation. When Galileo effectively demonstrated otherwise, it completely shattered the Catholic church’s credibility and thus Europe’s confidence of man’s privileged place within reality. With no absolute authority, even average men discovered the need to define their own frames of reference. Thus was born the concept of the sovereign individual, which marks the beginning of the Enlightenment.

We take it for granted, nowadays, that a person can have their own ideas about how the universe works. But in historical terms, this assumption is well outside the norm. The idea that a person not only can write down and publish their own ideas, but ought to do so as an exercise in self-actualization, would get modern Westerners lynched in most historical societies. The sudden powerlessness of God’s mediators to mete out divine justice created a private, secular mental space called “empiricism” in the minds of millions of men. In combination with the Thomist dogma of a constant natural philosophy unchanged by time, location, or the mental condition of a human observer, and the intense human need to discover answers for how he fits and functions within a larger universe, the arts and sciences blossomed to fill this space.

The unfortunate side effect of individualism was to introduce unprecedented feelings of alienation in ordinary people who perceived (and still perceive) a merely transactional relationship with their fellow man. Where before culture had been a predictable, prescribed set of beliefs for “us”, the sovereign individual found that one neighbor could believe whatever he fancied and another neighbor could believe something entirely different! A pairwise comparison between the beliefs of pre-Copernican peasants would have produced a tight cluster around the local priest’s dogma, but the post-Copernican found he had no moral authority to punish even the foolhardy and dangerous fancies of the village idiot. So not only does the modern man feel an unbridgeable average distance from his countryman, he still possesses the primitive desire to punish social defectors for the common good. In other words, he feels solipsistic and entitled, perceives he is different and special, and is therefore unrestrained in expressing his latent narcissism.

The weakness of a group comprised of alienated narcissists is obvious, and so the modern man feels an inexpressibly deep insecurity in the face of existential dangers. Why, if I jump on a grenade to save my squad, would my squadmate look after my wife and children? If he is a rational economic actor, and our relationship is predicated on maximizing personal happiness, he will only laugh at my stupidity and dismiss my self-sacrifice as a primitive instinct, deserving only to be swept into the dustbin of history. But if the group is made stronger by irrational atavisms, then it is in the individual’s rational best interest to exist within a high-trust society, which means the modern man is at the mercy of barbarians with healthy instinctual group bonds. With this palpable sense of national weakness, it is quite understandable that a man as smart as Goethe would take an interest in recreating pagan virtus.

But this raises the specter of societal dilemmas, where each individual is incentivized to pretend he is cooperating with the group, but secretly defecting. The Idealists confronted this paradox head-on, determining that the moral thing must be for rational elites to deceive individuals for their own good into forming tight-knit identity classes by appealing to the individuals’ primitive emotions, insecurities, narcissism, and repressed religious drive. Thus was born Marxism, the logical conclusion of classical liberalism. This ideology weaponized the fundamental moral impulse, charity, effectively removing all capacity for empathy in populations which practice it.

The behavioral science of propaganda/marketing soon followed, to appeal to more solipsistic instincts since all capacity for human connection had been extracted and crushed, as if by a psychotic neurosurgeon.

But the trouble with identity classes in Socialist theory, as with all categorizations, is the framing problem: any set of data can be explained by an infinite number of possible theories. Contra the pragmatism of common sense, philosophers declared that true, justified knowledge is impossible because, within the rules of rigorous clear thinking, it is impossible to make a warranted choice of a frame of reference. This brings us to the Current Year, where all news could be fake news, so you might as well believe what thou wilt!

The next installment in this series will be speculation about the future of Jungian Paganism (Zodiacism) as a replacement religion for Christianity, and how this invariably leads to Luciferianism. It will be a while because I want to maintain the quality of these posts.

Advertisements

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Culture war, part 2

    • Lizard King says:

      Lol, I tried to post an Escape from LA gif in a comment and failed miserably not once, but twice!

      At least there’s someone around who understands computer machines and how they worky. Me no understand.

    • Aeoli Pera says:

      I need to watch this movie or else the memeplex will leave me in the dust.

      • Lizard King says:

        Snake Plissken is the hero that America needs…but doesn’t really deserve…well actually yeah deserves too…hm.

        Oh come on Aeoli this movie is right up your alley! (I actually have no idea)

        It features Kurt Russel (luv u bb) playing a highly decorated SPESHUL OPS GLIDER PATROL ex-soldier who robbed Fort Knox or something and they need him to rescue the President (Escape from New York) and then later they want him to rescue the President’s daughter (Escape from LA) or some bullshit. It’s great because New York and LA have both been turned into giant prisons! Hurray for progress!

  1. Lizard King says:

    You can’t blackpill me, Aeoli! Your plan will never work!

    • Aeoli Pera says:

      I don’t think I’ve written a black-pilled post in at least a year. That said, you wouldn’t be the first to accuse me of excessive negativity. It’s not apparent to me because I’m describing things as I see them, and things as I see them are dark, but I find hope in understanding because it empowers right action.

      • Lizard King says:

        Oh you definitely aren’t being excessively negative. At least not to my eyes. I am a pessimist by nature though so who knows if I’m a good judge haha.

        And yes, things are dark, very dark indeed. Oh well, so sad, I don’t care. I’ll just keep being stubborn. If there’s one thing I’m good at, it’s being stubborn. Or wait, maybe it’s being dense or it might be…uhhh, I forget. If there’s one thing I’m good at, it is losing my train of thought.

  2. Cloom Glue says:

    That was very interesting. Now I understand why Mark Collett and others are using that individualist versus collectivist terminology. They are probably not understanding the Christian individual relationship to God. They only define individualism the way you explained it. I think the church did not fail to explain the individual’s relationship to God, but I see how a person immersed in rebellion and reformation, and “enlightenment” philosophy would entirely miss the Christian orientation of an individual.

    I have been studying the Alt-Right discussion personalities and I think they are in danger because they are trying to construct a new “common good” and collectivism definition outside of a Christian philosophy; eg. no Holy Spirit. Many are agnostics and atheists, apparently (I pick up the clues from them, from time to time).

  3. Ø says:

    >”The next installment in this series will be speculation about the future of Jungian Paganism (Zodiacism) as a replacement religion for Christianity, and how this invariably leads to Luciferianism. It will be a while because I want to maintain the quality of these posts”

    I don’t think that the term “Jungian Paganism” should be used interchangeably with Zodiacism. Jung’s intellectual output was focused upon and built around only one key aspect of Hermetic philosophy: the quaternity (which is also the structure of the human neocortex)

    I suspect Zodiacism proper will be/was comprised of something like 12 fundamental abstract/immaterial aspects or pillars which prop up/sustain the global pyramid society, but I’m only confident about 4 of them atm:

    -The Quaternity, aka Sagittarius’s target/crosshairs/bullseye (seen most simply represented in the Zodiac Killer’s logo)

    -The Cycle, seen in the Cancer symbol (itself a crab who lives by the cyclical rising and falling of the tide)

    -The False Duality (aka Gemini, the twins, aka Lucifer and Ahriman)

    -The Dialectic (aka Pisces, in whose symbol we see the basic mechanics of “Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis” represented by a primitive line drawing)

    Not sure about the other 8 right now, but atm I’m fairly confident about those four particular pages in Satan’s playbook.

    • Ø says:

      How and when it is inculcated and introduced will depend on a thousand various factors.

      • Ø says:

        That’s not to say that your speculation isn’t at least partially true, though, because it’s clearly in its “testing stages” at least, which we can see from media like Vampire Hunter D (the father at the beginning who issues D his contract/quest looks exactly like Carl Jung).

        Destruction of nuclear family unit : replacement of father figure in peoples’ lives with government/monolithic authority

        Replacement of Jehovah as Lord : Replacement of Christianity with Le Cercle of Le Zodiac

  4. Pingback: Esoteric analysis Final Fantasy 3/6 | Aeoli Pera

  5. Pingback: Final Fantasy 3/6, part 2 | Aeoli Pera

  6. Pingback: Re: masturbation | Aeoli Pera

  7. Pingback: Of disgrace and triumph | Aeoli Pera

  8. Pingback: The West is dead, and God has killed it | Aeoli Pera

  9. Pingback: Christianity without love for the brethren | Aeoli Pera

  10. Pingback: “Times change” (ultimate shit test update) | Aeoli Pera

  11. Pingback: Christian nihilism | Aeoli Pera

  12. Pingback: Premises of amoral egoistic Christianity | Aeoli Pera

  13. Pingback: Rahab’s “pathological altruism” | Aeoli Pera

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s