So church is out, unless you think I’m a special 0.1% kind of guy (hint: I’m not). Networking is in decline but it’s still viable. What I ought to do is open an esoteric Alt-Right bar/club, though this will require some security planning. It’s good to have a plan, and I still pray God will have mercy on this contemptible nation.
Demographic shifts become a crisis when the 2/3 supermajority is lost, so we must expect Bible-believing Christians will continue to dwindle and become a minority in America in about three years. But take heart, because despair is a sin and the church has survived pagan rulers before, and anyway they can’t hurt your soul. Here I stand, for I can do no other.
May your each of your whiglets be whigger than the last.
Advertisements
No it wont. The saps are doubling down. Time to Neanderthal Up.
HOLE UP, so whatchu sayin’ is…I should stay home and wait for my tribe’s matriarchs to send a shy, lovely lass my way in recognition of my intelligence and creative output?
I admit it’s a bold strategy, let’s see how it works out for you.
Hm, this chart reflects my observations as well. Even living away from poz central in the middle of nowheresville. Except there aren’t any bars or clubs so just take that one out of the chart.
All da church girlz wnt bad boiz nd the church guyz r all virginz.
(okay this isn’t really 100% true, I know a few church girls who married well)
Alpha fukz nd beta buckz.
Lol, although the bar idea is a good one, instead just have an online dating service.
Thalz Only. “Find your vault mate for the coming ice age at Thalz Only.” “If you only want to have sex in the missionary position for the sole purpose of procreation, Thalz Only.” “Are you too smart for Mensa? Just try Thalz Only.”
Also dont take too much stock in self reported studies like this. The data sets are a generally guide. Most sample sizes are only around roughly 1000-2000 people.
A lot of self reported studies can easily be disproved with some wandering around meat space away from the clinicians for a few days. These scientists would never interview or poll from a real sample set because the people from the real sample sets dont like interacting with them. However, very few self reported studies take this phenomenon into account.
Don’t be tedious, it’s okay to be wrong sometimes.
>(okay this isn’t really 100% true, I know a few church girls who married well)
Yeah, me too. My best friend growing up married one of those K-K-Krazy Konservative Dutch girls out in West Michigan, and they met at church (he’s pretty Alpha too). But anybody who’s honestly surveying the odds (hi Vox!) can tell you this is a rare exception.
Heh, “vault mate” :-).
Well, here’s the thing, all my friends who married well either met their mate at church, college, or were childhood friends.
So, while the chart is statistically true…it doesn’t mean best outcome. Which is why THALZ ONLY has to be a thing right after the t-shirts.
I’ll just change the title and focus of da blergh into the THALZ ONLY matchmaking service, and of course reintroduce droit du seigneur as we are traditionalists.
New blog title: Prima Nockthalgurlz Up nahmsayin?
Well, you’ll need to have a page dedicated to determining if you’re a TROO THAL and link it in headbar. That way you’ll scare away all the normie grilz(ree get out) and only attract the TROO THAL GIRLZ. I mean, think of the possibilities…you could promise to show them the “true recipe” for Thal Force lol.
“Close your eyes and suck the bleach out of this hose.”
Fuzzy Logic.
…he said to Aeoli Pera.
If you do things the normal way you will get normal results.
AKA 50+ percent chance of divorce.
“Why not BOTH?” is viable here. No reason to limit options.
Ultimately to find a quality girl will be about:
1. Making yourself as valuable a prospect as possible: Status, resources, social skills, and compatibility with the prospect.
2. Devoting enough time and grinding away at it in multiple social circles (Church+ the more normie locales).
Before you can do this you MUST have at least a decent irl social circle. If you don’t you get tossed by any girl who isn’t pathological.
Also, don’t underestimate the power of building strong relationships with men- especially higher smv.
That will help things immensely both in terms of your status and in the number of prospects open to you.
Not shown:
She watered my camels, so I gave her a nose-ring.
“Before you can do this you MUST have at least a decent irl social circle.”
“Also, don’t underestimate the power of building strong relationships with men- especially higher smv.”
These are both really good. Helps out with stuff other than girls too. Having friends is fun! Sort of! Most of the time! :D
Go join a cult. It’s probably the best modern way of emulating a tribal social network.
> go join a cult
the aeoli gmail dot pera blogspot edenist website server is tru kult.
Its like build a bear workshop, but with ideas.
No hate either, I love eating those damn bears.
heh heh heh
“We are now in the era of Low Male Investment and High Male Sexiness, or altered perceptions thereof.”
Delicious irony by CH, considering he and the rest of the manosphere are primarily responsible for this phenomenon he describes.
On the contrary, the divorce rate, single motherhood rate, and age of marriage have all been unaffected by PUA.
This, nothing wrong with inheriting an empty institution with filled coffers and real estate… this is why baby jay told people to pray in the closet
“On the contrary, the divorce rate, single motherhood rate, and age of marriage have all been unaffected by PUA.”
Thanks for the delicious red herring.
The fact of the matter is that factions are forming within the manosphere and there is modest, albeit at times vicious, conflict between them. Christian men who offer support to Roosh and Roissy (because anti-feminism) have a choice to make—outright reject their hedonist, anti-Godly masculinity as God commands, or face God’s wrath in light of perpetuating evil. If and when Christian men wake up, then they will put tremendous pressure on the PUA’s and MGTOW’s. Roosh and Roissy are products of their own design. Why are you white knighting for men who observably go to great lengths to commit sin, are unrepentant, and show no remorse for their actions?
>Why are you white knighting for men who observably go to great lengths to commit sin, are unrepentant, and show no remorse for their actions?
Because I have this thing where I consider imperfect action better than inaction. Which is better, to break a commandment or to fail to follow one? The men you criticize are trying to do the right thing as they understand it, and the men you lionize God will spit out of his mouth.
“Because I have this thing where I consider imperfect action better than inaction.”
You realize that Vox Day cleared stated if the response to a “discussion of a macro-societal level issue is ‘well, what about me?’, you are not fit to participate in the discussion. If you don’t care about anyone else’s interests, there is absolutely no reason for anyone else to take yours into account.”
Imperfect action that results in clear immoral results is woefully inferior to inaction. Seek the counsel of James 2:18 –> But someone will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
“Which is better, to break a commandment or to fail to follow one?”
Again, you are putting a secular spin on a holy matter. By willfully breaking His covenant of men and women refraining from sexual intercourse until they are married, Christian risk eternal damnation. God already knows what is in your heart. The question is will you let Him guide you or will you go off on your own path?
“The men you criticize are trying to do the right thing as they understand it, and the men you lionize God will spit out of his mouth.”
I criticize men who are foul in the nostrils of God, and I lionize the seekers of truth who act righteous in His name.
>You realize that Vox Day cleared stated if the response to a “discussion of a macro-societal level issue is ‘well, what about me?’, you are not fit to participate in the discussion.
You are retarded. I’m ashamed you found this blog.
“You are retarded. I’m ashamed you found this blog.”
More tasty treats, this time in the form of an ad hominem. You are employing rhetoric when the situation calls for dialectic. Have you not learned anything from your sensei?