Heartiste recently made the case that if all men were attractive, then thots would patrol themselves without the need for socioculturally enforced monogamy, and we’d get traditional Christendom back without Alpha males giving up their soft polygamy. This is like claiming we can have a high GDP per capita without borders: innumerate at best and naive in any case.
The math says you must pick AT LEAST one of the following poisons:
1) Unstable marriages.
2) R-selected Malthusian explosions.
3) Socially enforced monogamy.
4) Underclass of sexually degenerate helots.
If non-virgin women were capable of stable marriages you’d have some wiggle room, but the statistics overwhelmingly show they are not. Again, I’m totally in favor of training men in Game and women to be more attractive so they can have happier marriages that are more stable, but that has absolutely nothing to do with the population dynamics. I know math is hard for neurotypicals so I’ll explain in some future posts. (Meanwhile, try to think of a counterexample if you don’t believe me.)
Edit: While reflecting on this post it occured to me that it may be possible to derive the proper formula for the truism “Diversity + Proximity + Low Social Mood = War” and define the empirically determined constants.