Re: female K-selection in the modern day

I think female k selection still exists, we just don’t see it…It’s also possible that K selection females are also just going with the flow of modern society and are slowly feeling the pain of lying to themselves.

Comment on Statement of the problem re: neanderthal identity politics

Well yes, regardless of the rest that’s basically a given. Generally K-selected individuals have higher individual quality but this quality will be degraded by maladaptivity in an R-selected environment. The major difference between K females and males is that for females, it’s often sufficient to be born with high quality, whereas a male has to express his quality through achievement and sociosexual maladaptation (where status is accorded by fast life history values) tends to handicap this expression. Recall:

The Behavioral Correlates of Overall and Distinctive Life History Strategy

Both slow-LH and fast-LH persons display a number of behaviors that may be either adaptive or maladaptive in different contexts. Specifically, slow-LH individuals tended to behave in a manner that was considerate, kind, hardworking, and reliable but also socially awkward, insecure, and overcontrolling. Fast-LH individuals came across as talkative, socially skilled, dominate, and charming but also unpredictable, hostile, manipulative, and impulsive. These results are consistent with the evolutionary interpretation of LH strategies as being adapted to systematically different environments, rather than better or worse approaches to reproductive fitness overall.

If male k-selection is any indicator, then female k-selection has gone from strongly attenuated (by the environment) to effectively nonexistent in the last 50 years. However, one notes that higher-quality R females will still ape K social naivete (and thus presumed sexual innocence) in order to signal high marital fidelity, hence the “awkward nerdy girl” trope in both male and female porn.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Re: female K-selection in the modern day

  1. fuzziewuzziebear says:

    Everything about human female sexuality is so covert, that not even women understand its true nature. It is what separates us from the rest of the animals.

  2. kapy53 says:

    Slightly off topic, but does anyone else see Cro-Mag in the 30 year old boomer meme?

  3. Colby says:

    Female K-selection in the modern day has been effectively bred out of existence in the west, hence why feminism exists. There might be some R-selected females with residual K-selected traits, but it’s so fucking miniscule it is statistically irrelevant.

  4. My alternative view for consideration. I don’t think female attraction matters ultimately. Women simply align with power. Men fight over power (or should). She wants the winner, but what she wants is only sacrosant in a post-feminism environment a la decline. Animal men don’t ask for sex. They fight each other for it, and that is the game now and typically, except that now the alpha state debauches female sexual wealth. Violent men keep women in line, and make them wet. Men who are not dangerous are not respected or socially valuable, all the more stridently by unsophisticated animal social norms. A woman’s r/K value doesn’t make sense to me. She is not the sex gatekeeper everyone says: the government is, for now. There is no rape in the wild (or marriage). Her instincts know that. Permission is a major turn off. Rape presumes property rights, which requires governance, which requires men with power because women can’t socioeconomically arrange their way out of a wet paper bag.

  5. bicebicebice says:

    ‘Reality’ Doug says:
    July 31, 2018 at 7:29 pm

    just as with the thard identity politics problem, a better phrase is cultural politics. sapes are ugly and know they are ugly and fornication offers some respite and then another sape is born, as a statement almost to “look here we don’t need no geeky ass sheeeeeit” *proceeds to starv* “wtf help me geek man wtf I love Jesus now!”.

    the biggest thard problem is that they don’t want to be apes, ooga boogas being apes as indicated by google ai, they don’t want to be sapes (big “smarter” apes), and they don’t want to be normies which is the successfull mishmash basically a monkey in a suit, or as our greatest ally calls them, a goy. whats the problem with not wanting to be basically fauna? well thards keeps these people around, probably watered down just right over the millenia to have the build aspect but too weak to direct it to ones own, as it should be. teach a man to fish.

    every eugenic approach has involved targetinng dysgenics and that has resulted in 8 billion sapeoids on the planet.

    this is why based slit-eyed tjingtjongs can steal american tech while the (((msm))) schreeches about russia and openly calls american cities too white. the thards only killer instinct is killing himself, while his guests have the time of their lives.

    “women can’t socioeconomically arrange their way out of a wet paper bag.” neither can the thard, he is the last one keeping it all together for the other bunga-bunga attendes while the shithouse has caught on fire and the flames are rapidly spreading, the smart thards having already bailed whilst the cuckolded ones join the republican multicultu (they call it civ nat these days) and chants slogans about jerbs taxes and waving the flag, holding their mutt-babies or adopted african slaves saluting Mcdonalds.

    I had a point but I forgot what it was.

  6. Aeoli Pera says:

    >I had a point but I forgot what it was.

    Doesn’t matter, it goes in the canon. PROPHET BICE HAS SPOKEN

  7. bicebicebice says:

    Here is the point.

    “That return is what we’ve seen in Europeans in the last 500 years or so. A common man in England in 1600 would have been diagnosed with Asperger’s today. Never mind the extraordinary men of autism like Newton at the high end, considered batshit* even by the standards of the eccentric British gentry of the day. But this was merely due to group selection from warfare, not from any sort of problem solving directed toward the genetic problem.”

    There need not be muh purity spiraling as in 100% thal or bust, this is an attainable goal luckily, we don’t need double-digit T-scores. That is an unsobering thought, luckily, but still needs a modest call for action. Outlier score should be the first step and anything beyond is just gravy.

    This should unironically be a military expense project, super citizens not super soldiers, too bad the Americans let Koanic go and work for the Chinese instead for this very same “experiment”. Of course, who needs Eugnics when you got 100 million beaner-saoe-boogoids waving the flerb working jerbs and sort of paying smaxes.


  8. bicebicebice says:

    The glass is unironically half full and half empty regarding the thal question. Itz just a matter of what you do with the glass.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s