The Anti-Individualism Hypothesis

“The average reproductive cost to the individual, defined as risk times average cost of social reprisals, is higher for moral policing than moral defection.”

This is expected because women prefer to reproduce with amoral (dark triad) men, and because moral policing violates rule three of getting along with neurotypicals: don’t be a buzzkill. This means that where women are around, the risk of social costs for policing is very high (one acquires the reputation for being judgmental and is invited to fewer social functions–just ask cops). Insofar as moral policing is seen is attractive, we expect this is generally (but not always) a peacocking effect of the policer demonstrating immunity to social stigma and significantly higher status than the policed, which is attenuated by the cost of being a buzzkill.

If the Anti-Individualism Hypothesis is correct, it follows that morality policing must be a group concern with no liberal or capitalist solution. This is because if human freedom and fulfillment were maximized (the goals of liberalism and capitalism, respectively) the genetics predisposing individuals to amoralism (signalled by moral defection) would breed out other strategies. Therefore, we expect genetic selection for altruism will only occur in group selection where the group ethos includes religious justification for moral self-sacrifice.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The Anti-Individualism Hypothesis

  1. bicebicebice says:

    Big if true, give me a moral dose from church and a moral doused chillum of said church from a church wahmen, then place that goodboy in a society that is anti the formers. Let hilarity ensue.

    But the moral stock of stock sape women and stock sape men, make the entire thang redundant. Those wahmen might be attracted to breed with a what good men call a psycho but women see a strong myopic ideolgical compatriot instead, they also have no qualms about killing the child and be seen as even stronker among her witch kin. I know this story personally and everyone involved got a good scolding because neither sape got what they wanted (just for the sake of the civility of the “argument” sapes don’t want things they just react to whater gives them the biggest stimuli rise with a penchant for the most twisted dark stronk thingamajing avaible), and what jesus said about turning chillums against caretakers is super troo, a real watershed moment hehe.
    Can’t and won’t create adult individuals in a superstate run by women aka socalism, that part of the bibble offends most krishums because muh muh superstate-nanny and should bring all autistés into the fold straight up because it is the truth, itz just that these people suffer from elitism and butthurt which is understandable. No man wants zoomer tweens playing on his boomer-core servers, but then those chillums will hang out with the wahmen instead and become a tranny fueled by satanic social media.

    Sapes not even once. Turn to christ and beat your parents with a wooden stick.

  2. bicebicebice says:

    I forgot to add that that chillum is 6 years old and perfectly healthy, and if dna-tests only real use because of human limitations are adoptions then it is worth it. Mental adoption is a good viable alternative solution when the physical is a limitation.

  3. Aeoli Pera says:

    24 And it came to pass after this, that Benhadad king of Syria gathered all his host, and went up, and besieged Samaria.

    25 And there was a great famine in Samaria: and, behold, they besieged it, until an ass’s head was sold for fourscore pieces of silver, and the fourth part of a cab of dove’s dung for five pieces of silver.

    26 And as the king of Israel was passing by upon the wall, there cried a woman unto him, saying, Help, my lord, O king.

    27 And he said, If the Lord do not help thee, whence shall I help thee? out of the barnfloor, or out of the winepress?

    28 And the king said unto her, What aileth thee? And she answered, This woman said unto me, Give thy son, that we may eat him to day, and we will eat my son to morrow.

    29 So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him: and she hath hid her son.

    30 And it came to pass, when the king heard the words of the woman, that he rent his clothes; and he passed by upon the wall, and the people looked, and, behold, he had sackcloth within upon his flesh.

    31 Then he said, God do so and more also to me, if the head of Elisha the son of Shaphat shall stand on him this day.

    2 Kings 6

    You won’t hear that one at church.

  4. bicebicebice says:

    The irony is that is takes an individual to even come up with the concept of communism, the anti-individualism expressed by sapes is somehow them thinking they gamed the system but as usual they end up self-kevorkian as Tex said, when you see them light up in this way,get those chillums far far away from the sapes!

    Big if true subject I just can’t put the finger on what needs to be stated rather than expressed. A very good poast. Itz just that someone (innocent) is going to get killed when sapes start to think that they can think our out-thunk reality and God.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s