Generation Eschaton is already black pilled, and why

This one is dedicated to the Gen Xers who get really nervous as soon as you pointing out how much worse parents they were than the Boomers:

teensuicide

Inb4 “only the strong” LARPing about how sending your kids to public school actually makes them stronger because bullying is K-selection. There’s a reason interacting with these kids feels like talking to a felon on parole…and it’s because school has turned into institutionalized sex abuse of children. A few very strong-willed people can become stronger and harder after being betrayed by the adults they trusted, most don’t. But then, sapiens never could tell the difference between bullying (negative selection) and training (vertical cultural transmission), and if there’s one thing we can say for sure about recent genetic selection, it’s that nu-whites might as well be niggers.

So why did this happen and wat do? I’m reliably informed that I underweight the impact of endocrine disruptors in the Fishtown lifestyle, but I want to go a step further back. The real reason is that Gen Z are the first truly post-idealism generation. And, if you examine the suicide rates by race, sex, and religion, I guarantee that atheist male whites and Asians will be over-represented and religious female NAMs will be under-represented. This will track with the basic, biological need to believe in something, and not having it.

You can put the blame squarely at the feet of a generation that preached nihilism—nothing you believe matters, nothing you do matters—but never really lived it, like the atheists who decry Christian morality right before demanding basic human rights. And then, having filled their impressionable kids’ heads with this anti-idealistic programming and the emotional baggage of a couple divorces, they send those kids to public schools to be brainwashed. 80% of kids today believe gender is an outdated social construct. Just think for a second about the logistics of making “the color of the sky is a social construct” a dominant opinion such that your classmates believe you ought to be banned from social media for disagreeing. Would going through that process as a kid make you stronger?

Imagine being told since before you can remember that your thought life is merely emanations of material phenomena with no real existence or legitimacy beyond the pragmatism of group consensus. Imagine having it ingrained in you, at the tender age of six, that internal narratives are oppressive social constructs, such that if you want to be a “good” you suppress them until you fundamentally lack the ability to distinguish between evidence and theories.

That is why these kids are killing themselves. And that, Vox Day, is why you don’t understand how Jordan Peterson could have such a large audience.

This post-idealsim is why I’ve been warning people that “Generation Zyklon” doesn’t understand the difference between ideas and facts, or between memes and reality. They are even more broken than Millenials. If there is going to be victory, they will have to be trained, quite literally, from the ground up. What is an idea? What is logic? What is an abstraction? Can you give five examples of each? Most importantly, can you explain what truth is to a skeptical five year old? Gen Z wants to know what truth is and Jordan Peterson has an answer. It’s not the true answer, but it’s close enough for government work. That’s why the alternative to this basic training is suicide.

The one white pill, sitting in a neglected corner of Pandora’s box, is that training in virtue is the same thing as happiness. And it’s very simple to sell a good product. But it’s also hard to carry a tribe, like carrying a cross on your back.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Generation Eschaton is already black pilled, and why

  1. bicebicebice says:

    Based IF redpilled, an entire generation memed into becoming memes. Not the children of the corn but the children of the lulz so random church of the flying spaghetti monster + satan rocks ironically to the point of unironically. Can’t have parents if there are no adults!

    This is the power of atheism and nihilism, the same thing that feeds the jordan “wash penis” petersteiner and the varg “muh treestump” vikernes complex is the same thing, i really believe in a christian feudalist state, heck even a moslem might be respected by these chillums, latching on to anything after being shipwrecked in the melting pot-pozz.
    For a while.

    Of course, if they finish their training, and the “bullying worked”, they will kill off the entire planet, mostly, so there’s that. As with my own cuntry, I keep failing to see the thing that is worth all of this. A lot of people believe it is Space, which is a good guess I guess, but the revenge generation might not be that peaceful, it could also be a complete cold indifference, like Tex said:

    “When I was growing up I don’t know how many times I heard “That is a problem our children will face.” These cowards are only beginning to realize it is also a problem they would face when they were too old, too weak and full of regrets about their foolishness in saying such stupid things when they were younger. They thought they’d be dead by now but all they have done is assure their retirement will occur in very interesting times, if you know what I mean. It is one thing to be running from a cannibal horde in your twenties and another thing altogether to try to hobble along in your seventies. These idiots imagined their grandchildren running from vicious cannibal enrichment squads and they were okay with that so it is really a matter of being hoisted by your own petard. There’s nothing funnier than a sixty year old secular atheist frantically trying to escape a huge savage mob of like-minded souls chasing him for barbecue. After all, we are nothing but meat and death is the end so why shouldn’t this old fellow throw himself on the grill for the greatest good for the greatest number? He is old and according to utilitarianism will taste best with chives and chicken salt.”

    I got my rice and gold so im ready to go.

  2. Just Call Me Fishmail says:

    “Imagine being told since before you can remember that your thought life is merely emanations of material phenomena with no real existence or legitimacy beyond the pragmatism of group consensus. Imagine having it ingrained in you, at the tender age of six, that internal narratives are oppressive social constructs …”

    I don’t have to imagine it because I lived it well before Gen Zed showed up.

    The Doktors of the State showed up to figure out just what the hell was wrong with me at that “tender age of six” because I would talk with people like an adult with a higher-pitched voice.

    They didn’t leave me alone until I learned how to fake an IQ test, as in a lower IQ test score so I wouldn’t be quite as bright and shiny a little object for them to mould. It sometimes hurts a lot mentally to have to simulate that much of a drop in intelligence, but I remind myself that it’s for my own safety.

    Anonymity on the Internet also has its limits …

    “If there is going to be victory, they will have to be trained, quite literally, from the ground up.”

    Expat now and avoid the rush — these chunderheads will be the Hobbesean crap that what passes as the civilised world will have to fight. Pick your new allies from the limited selections with competence and care, since your old allies are already too complicit with their own future debauching and destruction to be of any use.

    Anyway, why do you think we have videos and songs like Rush’s “Subdivisions”?

  3. SirHamster says:

    > And that, Vox Day, is why you don’t understand how Jordan Peterson could have such a large audience.

    What has Vox ever said that indicates he doesn’t understand why JP has a large audience?

    > Gen Z wants to know what truth is and Jordan Peterson has an answer.

    Voxiversity is another answer. Which has an entire video for JP, because JP has a large audience and is promoted by the media as the Intellectual Dark Web.

  4. TM says:

    > And that, Vox Day, is why you don’t understand how Jordan Peterson could have such a large audience.

    Vox knows why JP is popular. It’s because JP speaks more truth than most and is thus worshipped. It’s also because he’s a globalist mouthpiece and gatekeeper, which is why he still has all platforms and isn’t completely mistreated by the media. His preemptive mirroring technique also allows his unanalytical viewers to feel emotionally close to him, which bonds them to him. What makes him so effective is that he’s a psychologist and thus knows exactly how to manipulate his viewers to create a cult following. No one was aware of what he was actually doing until I fed all the information to Vox and Duschene who then published everything.

  5. SirHamster says:

    >> “Not completely mistreated by the media”?
    > By what standard. They’ve slandard him as if he was being apointed judge.
    > And stop with the globalist lies too.

    By being the designated, publicized opposition.

    Notice how much media airtime Vox Day gets? Practically nil, because free publicity is still publicity. Consider McCain – hated by the press for a time during his presidential run, but lauded as the Maverick and a statesman before and afterwards when useful for the Left. Some slander by the media in of itself doesn’t prove he’s on y/our side.

    Peterson is globalist because of what his fuzzy philosophy is and does. A solid truthful foundation is needed for those who wish to pass through the storm.

  6. SirHamster says:

    > So he’s a globalist despite condemning the EU, huh?

    First search on Peterson + EU is this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YohsdelXG0c

    1. He doesn’t condemn globalism.
    2. He says that the EU is doomed because it “grew too fast” (~1:40). Observing that the EU will fail is not condemning the EU. There is no disapproval of EU as a project.
    3. He sees nationalism as dangerous because it won’t promote individualism (3:36). Where individualism is the divide and conquer strategy globalists and Satan have used to disconnect individuals from the very roots that sustain them. That is one of the topics of this blog to rebuild those lost connections.
    4. He thinks society needs to find the proper middle ground between Left and Right. (3:50) That is the age old scam of conservatives preserving liberal gains, where liberalism is ever working towards destruction.

    > Not sure you should be going on and on about the truth there…

    I did a bit of legwork up there to look into your claim. He doesn’t condemn the EU as a bad idea. Even if he did, that doesn’t mitigate his work for the UN, or the philosophy he promotes.

  7. TM says:

    >So he’s a globalist despite condemning the EU, huh?
    Have you been living under a rock? He worked for the UN and helped them write an important globalist document. He’s also directly tied to Soros and high-level bankers. Not surprising for a guy who admitted one of his goals is to move young people away from nationalism. Where he does disagree with the other globalists is their current pace and hard-forcing of diversity because he believes it will lead to more nationalism in the future. Peterson is a Globalist shill by definition.

    I even have a 7 page doc detailing all of his connections and associates (globalists).

  8. TM says:

    >“Not completely mistreated by the media”? By what standard. They’ve slandard him as if he was being apointed judge.
    He’s controlled opposition which is why he’s framed as le bad goy but still allowed to debate and freely speak his mind on their platforms. If he was real deal opposition they’d just block him because they don’t give positive and fair airtime to their actual opposition (nationalists, reactionaries, etc.).

  9. Aeoli Pera says:

    This argument is boring and unproductive. Everyone please summarize your points then wrap it up.

  10. He sees nationalism as dangerous because it won’t promote individualism (3:36). Where individualism is the divide and conquer strategy globalists and Satan have used to disconnect individuals from the very roots that sustain them. That is one of the topics of this blog to rebuild those lost connections.

    Nationalism can be every bit as oppressive and totalitarian as globalism. Changing poisons doesn’t represent a cure, just an alteration in cause of death. The solution is always in the dosage and what are the boundaries established.

    And Satan has used nothing to disconnect individuals except simple, old fashioned pride. As long as you keep assuming that the problem and solution is outside your efforts will always fail. The problem is always the nature of man, within each one’s heart. “[Jesus] died not for men, but for each man.” -CS Lewis

    He thinks society needs to find the proper middle ground between Left and Right. (3:50) That is the age old scam of conservatives preserving liberal gains, where liberalism is ever working towards destruction.

    Every idea was once new at some point in history. Since once upon a time, mastery of fire would have been the “liberal gains” I’m not sure shivering and starving in caves is that preferable. So tell me, how far are you rebelling against this scam? Rejecting fire? How much food do you refuse to eat?

    Oh wait, you’re on a computer, commenting on a website. I guess not very far.

    I did a bit of legwork up there to look into your claim. He doesn’t condemn the EU as a bad idea. Even if he did, that doesn’t mitigate his work for the UN, or the philosophy he promotes.

    You didn’t have to, citations available on request. “Maybe you should just think BIG->BAD.” -Jordan Peterson Or here: “Really big, poses a problem.” –Jordan Peterson again.

    Now I’ll be very interested to hear how being opposed to something “really big” and calling it a problem is support of globalism since currently a global government is the biggest thing we can devise.

    He worked for the UN and helped them write an important globalist document. He’s also directly tied to Soros and high-level bankers.

    During a period of time in which Vox Day was in favor of free trade. So I guess that makes Vox Day a globalist too? Or is it possible that people can learn and change their minds as they gain experience and new information?

    If he was real deal opposition they’d just block him because they don’t give positive and fair airtime to their actual opposition (nationalists, reactionaries, etc.).

    You mean like the time his YouTube account was locked? Or when Google locked out his account? (I remember hearing from several friends who resolved to get off google during that.) Or had his videos removed? More than once? What about these efforts to prevent him from speaking?

    So please tell me again how he’s not blocked?

  11. My point summed up: A lot of assumptions by commenters here are just wrong or poorly thought through. (excluding blog host – while we may disagree on some things, his points are thought through) Citations available in the comment locked in moderation right now.

  12. SirHamster says:

    Nationalism can be every bit as oppressive and totalitarian as globalism. Changing poisons doesn’t represent a cure, just an alteration in cause of death. The solution is always in the dosage and what are the boundaries established.

    That explains why you don’t have a problem with Peterson like I do. Nationalism isn’t a poison. Nations are the natural development of tribe, as a tribe is the natural development of family. Hearing you talk about the poison of nationalism makes as much sense to me as talking about the poison of family.

    Poor family dynamics does not make family poison. There are bad things done by individual nations, but that does not make the concept of a nation an evil and a poison.

    And Satan has used nothing to disconnect individuals except simple, old fashioned pride. As long as you keep assuming that the problem and solution is outside your efforts will always fail. The problem is always the nature of man, within each one’s heart. “[Jesus] died not for men, but for each man.” -CS Lewis

    The appeal to pride Satan has used is exactly the individualistic philosophy I criticized. “I can do this alone. All those other people are holding me back.”

    No, I need my community, even more than they need me. So I must plug in to my church and build her up. And likewise, I must support the nation of my home.

    …That is the age old scam of conservatives preserving liberal gains, where liberalism is ever working towards destruction.

    Every idea was once new at some point in history. Since once upon a time, mastery of fire would have been the “liberal gains” I’m not sure shivering and starving in caves is that preferable. So tell me, how far are you rebelling against this scam? Rejecting fire? How much food do you refuse to eat?

    When I said “liberalism”, I did not mean “new things”. If that’s what the word liberalism means to you, all I can say is that I’m not anti-new things.

    You didn’t have to, citations available on request. “Maybe you should just think BIG->BAD.” -Jordan Peterson Or here: “Really big, poses a problem.” –Jordan Peterson again.

    Thank you for the links, but those do not have anything to do with condemning the EU. You think that Peterson’s stated anti-BIG position makes him opposed to globalism and the EU. That’s fair, but I disagree.

    Now I’ll be very interested to hear how being opposed to something “really big” and calling it a problem is support of globalism since currently a global government is the biggest thing we can devise.

    Because by being anti-nationalism and pro-individualism, Peterson destroys the ability of individuals to effectively oppose globalism. Globalism works by cutting all the bonds of individuals to every competing structure. Globalism is very pro-individualism.

    Some globalist ideas that cut bonds:
    1. Feminism – Destroy the bond between men and women, father and family
    2. Abortion – Destroy the mother-child bond
    3. Multiculturalism – Destroy the individual’s bond with his culture (religion)
    4. Unlimited immigration – Destroy the bond between nation and land

    The individual, without the bond of family, land, and religion, is unable to oppose globalism.

    Anti-BIG is insufficient to be opposed to globalism. Families and nations are opposed to globalism, and nations are ultimately BIG families. Anti-BIG opposes the antidote to globalism.

    The rest of your post is either directed at someone else, or your own opinion, so I have no further response.

  13. aiaslives says:

    @TM
    >I even have a 7 page doc detailing all of his connections and associates (globalists).

    Can you post it?

  14. SirHamster says:

    Assuming that last post got binned, this is the counterpoint summary.

    Nationalism is not a poison. Bad things done by nations does not make nations or nationalism a poison. But globalism, a repeat of the Tower of Babel, is a poison as evidenced by its systematic destruction of competing structures using feminism, multiculturalism, secularism, etc. The result is the atomized individual, who foolishly believes himself free while stripped of all strength and support. That’s how Peterson’s individualism and anti-nationalism (anti-BIG) ends up supporting globalism.

    Nations are going to be present in heaven. Nations are not evil, though nations of evil men will do evil.

  15. TM says:

    >Because by being anti-nationalism and pro-individualism, Peterson destroys the ability of individuals to effectively oppose globalism. Globalism works by cutting all the bonds of individuals to every competing structure. Globalism is very pro-individualism.
    Exactly. And Peterson still admits to being left-wing, too. Unlike Vox, there is no reason at all to believe Peterson has changed. In fact, shilling Individualism is one of the most pro-Globalist thing you could do.

    That is all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s