Further thoughts on the nature of genius

The mechanism of prodigious genius can be described as the rapid generation of expert intuition in some field by obsessive-compulsive, subconscious recombination of its fundamental principles, which provides the benefits of many years’ worth of mental rehearsal, relentlessly driven by fixation and the “genius addiction” proposed in previous posts. That is, a creative genius who has become fixated on a new field of study as being an impediment to his inarticulate One Problem (his destiny, as described by Charlton) will rapidly develop the instincts of a seasoned veteran in the field in a fashion that is not adequately explained by high IQ or the polymathic transference of shared principles between isomorphic applications in separate fields. I propose this phenomenon is uniquely a function of very high conscientiousness turned inward, having been severed from external concerns by 1) very high psychoticism and 2) the desperate need to find and communicate newer and bigger insights (representing the addiction’s next “hit”). I imagine the focus of this conscientiousness turns more and more inward until it operates at the highest possible efficiency, below the lumen, to produce the insights craved by the addicted brain.

To explain, I’ll refer to some concepts from math education. An ordinary, very high-IQ person will read a concept definition and develop the concept model from this very easily. However, he is not driven to obsessive-compulsive recombination of these definitions to find new concept models. To the extent he does so, it follows the ordinary path of garden-variety creativity. That is, he tries one combination, then another, then goes about his business and returns to the subject the next day. A genius comes at the problem from the bottom up. Rather than reading books full of concept definitions and generating concept models from these, his form of “intelligence” is (for example) to read a single, elementary book and come to an understanding of the rest by mental recombination. So that, when he reads a particularly difficult theorem in an advanced book he doesn’t think “interesting” like the high-caliber mind because he has just that moment been inspired to make the conceptual leap, he thinks “this is an elegant expression of what I was thinking about yesterday” because for him the model already exists in an inarticulate form. Effectively, the obsessive mental rehearsal serves in place of the drilled mechanical calculations necessary to produce true expert intuition, because this is a brain which is addicted to obtaining new expert intuitions and then making them explicit. This mechanical difference explains the difference in the level of creative output between typical high-IQ and genius.

Inarticulate understanding is much more powerful than articulate knowledge, but it typically has a very limited domain. Instinct is only useful for instinctual actions (like how to defend yourself from an attacker) and intuition is limited to areas of expertise where your training and experience are so great that you’ve noticed more patterns subliminally than your conscious mind can recognize and articulate. The canonical example is the 20-year firefighter who senses something and understands it’s time to get everybody out without knowing why exactly.

To dig deeper, Kahneman and Klein worked from a psychological model of recognition-primed decision making. In this description, intuition results from a process of recognizing patterns and similarities to past situations that have either been experienced directly or learned from others. (Of course, not all intuition is about a quick decision made in a collapsing building. Often it arises as a “gut instinct” influencing a more deliberate analytical process. It serves different ends but operates similarly in both cases. In both cases, one of intuition’s strengths is to quickly weight different types of data from different sources into a coherent judgment. “Thinking fast” is about the speed of the thinking, not the tempo of the situation we are in.)

However, this model can only lead to valid intuitions under certain conditions. First, a regular and predictable environment is needed, and second, prolonged practice allows an expert to learn these regularities. Here’s how Kahneman summarizes it:

“Memory also holds the vast repertory of skills we have acquired in a lifetime of practice, which automatically produce adequate solutions to challenges as they arise, from walking around a large stone on the path to averting the incipient outburst of a customer. The acquisition of skills requires a regular environment, an adequate opportunity to practice, and rapid and unequivocal feedback about the correctness of thoughts and actions. When these conditions are fulfilled, skill eventually develops, and the intuitive judgments and choices that quickly come to mind will mostly be accurate.” (p. 416)

This means the context matters. In an irregular or unpredictable environment, we should always be skeptical of intuitive judgments (including our own). Firefighters, chess-players, doctors, and even athletes face repeated situations that are fundamentally orderly enough to be predictable and allow the acquisition of skill.

Dave Algoso
Just how useful is intuition in a complex situation?

This is discrimination-type intuition, not discernment-type intuition. The accuracy and usefulness of the intuition generated from this process depends mostly on IQ and whether a field is “hard” or “soft”, which is to say the number of explanatory factors necessary to make a reliable prediction. A genius with a high IQ, expert intuition, and very little information would make a poor detective because the work depends much more on familiarity with many accumulated details than Hercule Poirot’s ability to put them together from the comfort of his chair. A genius with a (relatively) low IQ working in math will spend all of his time reinventing low-level concepts and restating them in idiosyncratic forms because he lacks the IQ necessary to absorb the sheer breadth of existing fundamentals in the field.

I have surprisingly little of the discrimination type of intuition in juxtaposition with my IQ and discernment, and this asynchronous development is likely a common feature of Asperger’s. However, being a genius has allowed me to overcome this somewhat by rapidly generating field-specific expert intuition in the way I described in the first paragraph (through almost purely imaginative recombination), but these rapid acquisitions (e.g. interpretation of movies and architecture) have conspicuously failed to produce a general factor of discriminating intuition.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Further thoughts on the nature of genius

  1. Mycroft Jones says:

    So that, when he reads a particularly difficult theorem in an advanced book he doesn’t think “interesting” like the high-caliber mind because he has just that moment been inspired to make the conceptual leap, he thinks “this is an elegant expression of what I was thinking about yesterday” because for him the model already exists in an inarticulate form.

    Was thinking “this”. But then I realized that when I feel “this”, it is Vox Day trying to dumb things down enough so he can communicate them to “normies”. Yeah, for someone like Vox Day, a normie is teetering right on the IQ edge of what everyone else considers Genius.

  2. thordaddy says:

    Genius is self-annihilating. Meaning, genius seeks Final Liberation. So genius is deracinated, ie., severed at the root. Anti-racist. Radically autonomous. At war with his fathers. The free will of genius is cursed. What can inspire a turnabout must come from outside of genius. Genius will not inherently survive.

  3. Obediah says:

    A jeenyus always asks “why?”

  4. bicebicebice says:

    “thordaddy says:
    October 25, 2018 at 11:04 pm”

    Itz just inversed black comedy slapstick, where the protagnist falls off the planet with the nuclear bomb he built taking everyone with him, instead of simply slipping on a banana peel.

    “Genius will not inherently survive.”

    Earth is a place for animals, navigating space is for high IQ Beings. Gonna take some shots here with a machinegun; “GUYS STOP SPERGING ABOUT SPACE WE NEED TO SAVE THE WEST”, genius can thrive on earth, but waiting firmly on the ground of that ladder are the nigger-monkey tribes waiting for the neurotic-ape to slip with his thingamajings into the maw of earth (death for some). Genious can not survice especially if genius kills itself willingy, as is the case with America and Western Europe.

    Listening to my frenchie-media, always do they use the term “le pays de anglo-saxons”, itz interesting how some who reside in those countries have absolute zero belief in themselves, in the great scheme of things, when it comes to the next tangible frontier of expansion. Instead they are that autistic sperg, who when push comes to shove after all the preparations are made, like Trump, decides to “nah im gonna keep being a nigger-monkey and praise non-whites because they are paramount to our survival remember tacos DEM PROGRAMS and based republican voters (notevenathing).” https://i.postimg.cc/63TsD552/2016-election-by-race-sex.jpg “non-hispanic white”. Imagine being this conquered shackled and fucked up the ass. They are so disgusted by you they don’t even allow you to have a name.

    There is only one sentient being on this planet and that is the undiluted Anglo-Saxon male, in our times, dabbling in any other race, succor for invaders is not altruism, leads to niggromancy, jewery and the globohomo gayplex mishmash mediocracy, it is not idiocracy it is just a lukewarm lul of people who didn’t want to take that final step and decided to regress into something that makes Koko the gorilla look even plus smarter than today, each passing day.

    A race of Angels that cut off their own wings, that’s what im seeing in the West right now, the genius only real friend is nature and natural feedback, and if we do basic math, the self-imposed end game of the west becoming a niggerhole, then nobody has the right to complain about some sperg spending 15+ hours per day on videogames. This leads to two viable solutions, christian-fedualist eco-fascism for the disenfranchised (disappointed) savy 1xx+ IQ white enough man, or, Global-Capitalism aka Globalism for the invidual, not the peasants (imagine being so stupid thinking anything would benefit the “human resources” the common commoner – giants do nothing but eat after all.

    TLDR ” if i bring myself down to their level maybe they will like me accept me and vote for me, after all, can’t be a sperg you just gotta follow the societal norms to become a WINNER”

    Connect with people that won the genetic-lottery before we can rig it so the house always wins and let the monkeys-in-manpants irregardless of race loiter around with the niggers that they worship, this is the word “rustic” to a sape, whilst the giants squeeze them of their resources met with no protest at all, quite the contrary.

    https://pics.me.me/left-exit-12-the-final-frontier-of-space-babysitting-people-30454984.png remember that experiment where the scientist had to cancel it, because the baby started to act like the monkey instead of vice versa? All women, all non-whites, that is the deal and you can’t stomach it. Jesus died for them so that you can be free and tinker around, the first red pill is that not a single one of the 8billion sapes on this planet needs or can even comprehend your “helping them”. Call them based, shower them with praise, give them shit, do whatever, but don’t expect it to stick longer than five fucking seconds.

    IM TALKING ABOUT NIGGERS FFS all of them are niggers, get comfortable that you are 0.0001% of the worlds population and make the best of it, my humble advice is getting the hell out of here to an environment that rewards the feedback the curious-virtuous-genius craves. Earth is a communist paradise for monkeys, adam and eve were the original niggers babysat by god because leave them alone for 1 second and the house burns down, just like a niggger plopped down in the west or a woman recently been given the right to vote, instantly killing 1.5 billion chillums in the blink of an eye, imagine the year 10 000…..this is all you get for a friday you litte fuckers happy weekend.

    ᠌ ᠌ ⎳
    ᠌ ᠌᠌ ᠌ ▬

  5. thordaddy says:

    Genious can not survice especially if genius kills itself willingy, as is the case with America and Western Europe. — bicethrice

    Genius is self-annihilating. Genius does not naturally perpetuate from what can be reasonably interpreted in the evidence. Genius NEEDS TO BE INSPIRED to perpetuate, ie., resonate beyond the physical. Genius must assume objective (S)upremacy as highest reality. Otherwise, genius is “bound to entropy.” So (white) Genius rejects (P)erfection. This is the current collective reality of “Western” genius. We bound in-tripping.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s