Apropos of absolutely nothing:
Turns out it’s 3/10. Wonder why.
-
Recent Posts
Neandersphere
Current (2019)
- Edenism Discord server
- Koanic's forum (Neanderhall 3)
- Vault-Co backup
- Tex's new blog (now 80% less navigable!)
- Koanic's Cyberpocalypse Now
- Better backup of Koanic Soul
- Fragmented backup of Koanic Soul
- Biceblog prime
- BorgoBicenizer
- Glosoli's blog
- Fox's blog
Drop me an OT comment if I need to update this.Prerequisites
- Ethos of the blog
- Trust between neighbors is the cultural basis of civilization.
- Texas Arcane 101
- Neanderthal theory of Asperger's (Rdos)
- Adaptivity decreases in upper ranges of IQ
- Male groups rise and decline according to a very predictable pattern
- MOPs, Geeks, and Sociopaths—another description of the historical pattern
- Psychometric adaptations of these cycles suggest the West is approaching an extinction-level event
- The extraverted personality is simply dopamine addiction to extrinsic "carrot and stick" motivators
- The M0 virus: Dopamine-addicted extraverts are broken, psychopathic predators whose populations follow Malthusian boom-bust patterns
- Jews explained: Traits of cosmopolitan elites and serfs with high (India, Europe) vs. low (China) average genetic distance
- Cosmopolitan religion converges to Zodiacism over time
- The deeply held conceits of the Last Man are a rational hedge against loss in a society where trust is deteriorating
Resources
Other stuff I read
Pay me
Archives
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
Meta
3s. (2×7: 9, 5×7: 12, etc. That explains the 7s.)
plz to explain “2×7: 9, 5×7: 12”. It looks like you’re adding, not multiplying, but you took the time to use the proper character so I’m confused.
I am adding, that’s why I used : instead of =.
I don’t have a why, but this is my intuition. It’s all about 3 (the same way 9 multiplied by something gives you two digits that add up to 9.)
>Wonder why.
Something something zodiacism metaphysics
plumbus
Since you can write 0.5 as 0.49999999… the answer is “all of them”
Shit, you’re right.
I suppose the question is the opposite: how many rational numbers have decimal representations which are NOT repeating?