H/T an anonymous moon presence:
“Amschel’s story is a great tragedy. A sensitive, intelligent and good man is born into a megalomaniacal family of generational satanists. He discovers he must be a ruthless predator. It’s not in his character. He has a soul. He resists and is murdered.”
sounds about right. Either that or he actually just killed himself
This is something that must be understood: the greatest threat to the real ruling class is defection. As such, they control each other with the promise of violence should the project ever be threatened (beyond all the lesser methods and programming)!
In terms of genetic adaptivity, there isn’t any difference between killing yourself and being murdered. Either way, there was clearly NO PLACE for a moral man among the class of people who are permitted to leave inheritances to their children. That would upset the natural law, you see, (because the law of nature is power).
I’ve been thinking about this lately as an expression of spiteful mutations and how this appears to be adaptive in an elite ruling class. There’s something about the attitude of established societies that’s intensely dysgenic (FYI it’s called social epistasis), but what’s curious is that some places survive the extinction predicted in mouse utopia and merely continue their miserable existence as shitty genetic crab buckets for a few millennia.
Man by definition is a creature who solves his problems by killing others and the spoils go to the genetic lines that kill first, without mercy or qualms. They are the men who have borne the children who surround you right now. Our race is the lineage of Cain and scarcity makes us act according to our innermost nature. Do you want to pause to try to think about a more rational solution? Well, your head will be crushed by a rock thrown by another man who simply acts impulsively and it is that man who will write history and lie down with your wives and daughters. See why this is a rigged game designed in such a way that sane people cannot win at it? The crazy thing is, because of modern weapons, psychopaths and sociopaths can’t win at it anymore either. They won’t allow that notion to stay their hand, however.
Funny how they appear to lack almost all the natural instincts needed to survive independently and as a group their strongest instinct is to kill other groups.
Most importantly, since the world seems to be in the grip of a new generation of creatures who look, sound and act like Melonheads … is it possible they remain with us even now? As always, our lives are meaningless to them because they do not regard us as human. Seriously, looking at people sometimes, can you blame them? Most people act like they aren’t really human, rather a kind of zombie who is a form of human simulacra. Believing that most people are “human beings” is an act of faith. The evidence is lacking. The truth is they act like beasts on two legs. Can you blame the elite for treating them accordingly?
If you want to be happy, the last thing you want to be on this earth is a decent man, because you’ll make people uncomfortable just by existing.
>The shitlib is a phenotype specialized for hypocrisy, never forget that.
Their words follow their revealed preference without memory or shame.
This comment ties in perfectly with the Zero Hp thread posted above.
Shitlibs are better than conservatives at lying. Especially to themselves.
Jews are the absolute best at deception of self and other, and thus they rule the material world.
This is probably the answer to the question I posed to the moonman in real life: “why are evil people smarter?” That is, it’s not so much a “smarts” thing as playing the game by the rules. Hence, perhaps, the stereotype that Good is Dumb.
What I conclude from all this is that Satanism is adaptive for ruling a crab bucket where everybody has skeletons in their closets.
“They worship snakes and phallic symbols equally and sacrifice their own kind liberally to these idols, believing themselves to be created by same.”
“When they observe a man who excels through quickwittedness and knowledge, they say: ‘for this one it is more befitting to serve our Lord.’ They seize him, put a rope round his neck and hang him on a tree where he is left until he rots away.”
– Ibn Fadlan, (Arabic scholar writing on customs he observed amongst the Khazar people)
“There is nothing mysterious about the cruel treatment meted out by the Bulgars (Khazars) to people who were overly clever. It was based on the simple, sober reasoning of the average citizens who wanted only to lead what they considered to be a normal life, and to avoid any risk or adventure into which the ‘genius’ might lead them.” He then quotes a Tartar proverb: ‘If you know too much, they will hang you, and if you are too modest, they will trample on you.’ He concludes that the victim ‘should not be regarded simply as a learned person, but as an unruly genius, one who is too clever by half.’ This leads one to believe that the custom should be regarded as a measure of social defence against change, a punishment of non-conformists and potential innovators.”
-Turkish orientalist Zeki Validi Togan, academic authority on Ibn Fadlan
Think about the effect that centuries of this kind of behaviour would have on your gene pool. Think about what sort of people would be produced by it.
Here is a Tartar proverb about the Khazar people over a thousand years old on that very subject:
“If you know too much, they will hang you, and if you are too modest, they will trample on you.”
Think about a thousand years of genetic engineering based on this principle.
Therefore, we should expect rulers and ruling classes to be evil, as a rule, because the lowest common denominator is sin. Anything otherwise should be a surprise. On the other hand, it’s just so easy to enjoy the company of highly effective people.