This is a visual representation of the model I was asserting a couple days ago regarding the market demand for increased surveillance in a simultaneously immoral and irresponsible society.
Here are some starter data points:
(x, y, z) = (Justice, Fun, Freedom)
Aspies, reported preference: (8, 5, 5)
Aspies, revealed preference: (1, 9, 9)
Homo sapiens, reported preference: (5, 8, 5)
Homo sapiens, revealed preference: (9, 1, 9)
Cro magnon, average NW European whites, reported preference: (9, 4.5, 4.5)
Cro magnon, average NW European whites, revealed preference: (6, 4, 9)
Melonheads, reported preference: (5, 8, 5)
Melonheads, revealed preference: (5, 5, 8)
There are likely mathematical inconsistencies in those choices, as I was doing them by eye.
This graphic was inspired by my response to Bice’s luddite treestumping:
I think you have the right idea when you say our salvation as a species is to be as boring as possible, so the sapes won’t want our food even if it’s free (as in Denmark). It’s like being Amish, except you boil off your party girls to other countries by having no parties to go to.
So if the treestump represents the revealed preference of aspies to create a little utopia where they have complete control over everything, the (1, 9, 9) strategy, then I’m suggesting that a Ned Flanders (4.5, 9, 4.5) strategy would allow for less purity spiraling and larger group sizes.