I think it’s easiest to think about the formation of occasional non-Jewish mafias if we propose a personality trait for extended kin selection measured by a “mafia quotient” MQ. That is, the personal tendency to engage in mafia formation. Then it’s not surprising if we observe the occasional Irish, Sicilian, or Latvian mafia to form. These groups, despite their low average IQ, will occasionally have enough of them in the same place with highish ability, the right economic factors, and the absence of higher-MQ competitors. If we then propose that this MQ is the same thing as ethnocentrism, we have a working model.
I’d be curious to determine whether mafia formation is more of a positive or negative ethnocentrism thing, but I’ll have to read Dutton’s book for that. (I suspect it’s positive ethnocentrism, based on the example of Irish politics in Minnesota.) So instinctive subversion of a host society is likely the simple result of being a minority group in that society with high positive ethnocentrism. If Western policy is the practice of favoring law-abiding citizens over criminals (traditionally) through a private protection racket, then the mafia is a parallel structure competing to provide private protection with the intent of favoring the minority group.
So we can begin with the naive, Ancap assumptions about the world, then add ethnocentrism: https://www.amazon.com/Race-Differences-Ethnocentrism-Edward-Dutton/dp/191297505X
In its raw form, class looks like this: http://albionawakening.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-norman-kings-bad-because.html
In its next form, government looks like the mafia: https://www.amazon.com/Sicilian-Mafia-Business-Private-Protection/dp/0674807421/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=gambetta&qid=1563050536&s=books&sr=1-2
In a society where trust is in short supply and democracy weak, the Mafia sells protection, a guarantee of safe conduct for parties to commercial transactions. Drawing on the confessions of eight Mafiosi, Diego Gambetta develops an elegant analysis of the economic and political role of the Sicilian Mafia.
This effectively requires the existence of guilds, so you don’t see anything above simple gangs in e.g. Africa.
Anyway, just some notes for building up Overwatch theory a bit more. If you imagine that the purpose of “dark side” elites is to sign off on legitimate commercial operations and the purpose of “light side” elites is to sign off on legitimate drug deals (by choosing which ones to bust), then you end up with a very stable and logical system of loosh wicking upward and negative transference downward like in The Wire.
Other stuff I’ll probably want to refer to:
Kevin MacDonald’s books
War is a Racket
The Underground History of American Education
Yuri Bezmenov stuff
The Creature from Jekyl Island
Codes of the Underworld
The Power Elite
Liars and Outliers
I also need something that explains the simple economic utility of occultism for elite groups in a straightforward, analytical way.