Inspired by a debate with an unwilling Calvinist.
It’s pretty clear that God changes his mind:
“I have seen these people,” the Lord said to Moses, “and they are a stiff-necked people. 10 Now leave me alone so that my anger may burn against them and that I may destroy them. Then I will make you into a great nation.”
11 But Moses sought the favor of the Lord his God. “Lord,” he said, “why should your anger burn against your people, whom you brought out of Egypt with great power and a mighty hand? 12 Why should the Egyptians say, ‘It was with evil intent that he brought them out, to kill them in the mountains and to wipe them off the face of the earth’? Turn from your fierce anger; relent and do not bring disaster on your people. 13 Remember your servants Abraham, Isaac and Israel, to whom you swore by your own self: ‘I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and I will give your descendants all this land I promised them, and it will be their inheritance forever.’” 14 Then the Lord relented and did not bring on his people the disaster he had threatened.
We can interpret this 3 different ways:
1) God can change his mind.
2) God lied by saying that he would wipe out the Israelites when he knew that wasn’t ultimately his intention, without qualifying the statement with conditions
3) This quote is misrepresenting the original event.
The first option is the simplest, most obvious, and least subversive reading.
(This is the part where you call me names in the comments.)