Misanthropy is misandry

…with a bit of plausible deniability.

You may have noticed that white women have become increasingly insane in their advocacy for savages to do savage things. Compare the response to Philando Castile, an upstanding black man who legitimately dindu nuffin, to meth dealer George Floyd. This can’t be adequately explained by the greater susceptibility of slow life history strategists to the narratives pushed by spiteful mutants (although that plays a part). Similarly, being a woman is the best predictor of being a social justice warrior, above and beyond agreeableness, verbal IQ tilt, high disgust sensitivity (i.e. high neuroticsm, authoritarianism), etc.

The reason for this is that women have a reproductive interest in sowing disorder when they sense a lot of men in their ethnic population have lost the desire to reproduce. It’s a Xanatos gambit: they either get raped by high-libido savages and their genes get mixed into that adaptively superior race, or they score one of the few high-libido men remaining in their own race. For women, tearing down patriarchal civilization is win-win. This protects them from the all-too-likely threat of spending their entire reproductive strategy on a man whose genes have forgotten the principle of struggle. In effect, there’s nothing a woman’s vagina hates more than the penises of middle class men:

Struggle means a choice between being hungry or being in charge. Hence, women will use their political power to tear down the patriarchy that dared–dared, I say!–to give them political power, so that they only have to sleep with extremely religious peasants (e.g. black lives matter, Calvinists, Mohammedans) or Nietzschean feudal slave owners. They really don’t care about foreign invasions because only the men’s genes get wiped out, and if the men allowed that to happen they would deserve it anyway. As for me, I’m more of a “human zoo” kind of aristocrat, but if k-selection and dysgenics have produced such binary thinking retards that they’ll only give me the choice between enslaving people and going extinct, then I’ll source chains in bulk and lose no sleep over it.

Eve took the apple, and if Adam wants to be in charge he has to take responsibility for things that aren’t his fault. That’s how being in charge works. It means being on the hook for the results that happen under your charge, full stop. The only unforgivable sin a leader can commit is weakness. If God lost the battle with Satan, we wouldn’t care about his ideas of morality anymore. There’s literally no reason to be good to normies other than serving God. They don’t deserve shit from me. So I treat them better than they deserve without expecting appreciation. The hard limit on benevolent leadership is morality because immoral people will always tear nice things to pieces, it’s just logistically impossible to be genteel with people who aren’t good. If people want better leadership, they have to choose between being better followers or becoming the leaders they want to have and carrying the ingrates on their backs themselves. If they choose neither, then they’ll be ruled by the worst man in the room, and it won’t bother me because I have enough to worry about herding my own NPCs.

I’d rather be nice to you people but this isn’t a negotiation. Reasoning with children is a category error. Any ghetto nigger can tell you acting right is about respect and respect is about consequences. You will always have the leader your morality deserves.