Misanthropy is misandry

…with a bit of plausible deniability.

You may have noticed that white women have become increasingly insane in their advocacy for savages to do savage things. Compare the response to Philando Castile, an upstanding black man who legitimately dindu nuffin, to meth dealer George Floyd. This can’t be adequately explained by the greater susceptibility of slow life history strategists to the narratives pushed by spiteful mutants (although that plays a part). Similarly, being a woman is the best predictor of being a social justice warrior, above and beyond agreeableness, verbal IQ tilt, high disgust sensitivity (i.e. high neuroticsm, authoritarianism), etc.

The reason for this is that women have a reproductive interest in sowing disorder when they sense a lot of men in their ethnic population have lost the desire to reproduce. It’s a Xanatos gambit: they either get raped by high-libido savages and their genes get mixed into that adaptively superior race, or they score one of the few high-libido men remaining in their own race. For women, tearing down patriarchal civilization is win-win. This protects them from the all-too-likely threat of spending their entire reproductive strategy on a man whose genes have forgotten the principle of struggle. In effect, there’s nothing a woman’s vagina hates more than the penises of middle class men:

7c612f7de0099a3a5ea05658276495f5

Struggle means a choice between being hungry or being in charge. Hence, women will use their political power to tear down the patriarchy that dared–dared, I say!–to give them political power, so that they only have to sleep with extremely religious peasants (e.g. black lives matter, Calvinists, Mohammedans) or Nietzschean feudal slave owners. They really don’t care about foreign invasions because only the men’s genes get wiped out, and if the men allowed that to happen they would deserve it anyway. As for me, I’m more of a “human zoo” kind of aristocrat, but if k-selection and dysgenics have produced such binary thinking retards that they’ll only give me the choice between enslaving people and going extinct, then I’ll source chains in bulk and lose no sleep over it.

Eve took the apple, and if Adam wants to be in charge he has to take responsibility for things that aren’t his fault. That’s how being in charge works. It means being on the hook for the results that happen under your charge, full stop. The only unforgivable sin a leader can commit is weakness. If God lost the battle with Satan, we wouldn’t care about his ideas of morality anymore. There’s literally no reason to be good to normies other than serving God. They don’t deserve shit from me. So I treat them better than they deserve without expecting appreciation. The hard limit on benevolent leadership is morality because immoral people will always tear nice things to pieces, it’s just logistically impossible to be genteel with people who aren’t good. If people want better leadership, they have to choose between being better followers or becoming the leaders they want to have and carrying the ingrates on their backs themselves. If they choose neither, then they’ll be ruled by the worst man in the room, and it won’t bother me because I have enough to worry about herding my own NPCs.

I’d rather be nice to you people but this isn’t a negotiation. Reasoning with children is a category error. Any ghetto nigger can tell you acting right is about respect and respect is about consequences. You will always have the leader your morality deserves.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Misanthropy is misandry

  1. rapist says:

    This is why winners shouldn’t miscegenate with the losers, regardless of sex. It’ll happen regardless, so whatever.
    >If God lost the battle with Satan, we wouldn’t care about his ideas of morality anymore
    I would.

    • Aeoli Pera says:

      At first.

      You know, like the old skit where the woman is asked whether she was raped, and she says “at first”.

      • not so rapist says:

        If I took that to be true then I’m without question destined for hell.

        • Aeoli Pera says:

          You are in fact destined for Hell, unless your sins have been forgiven through Jesus’ blood.

          • Aeoli Pera says:

            I’m just giving you the cold, hard facts of life here, but for whatever reason (call it luck for lack of a better term) God is both benevolent and all-powerful.

          • richy says:

            It’s good that our sins are forgiven, and that Jesus’ blood pays the price for our sins. Good that God sacrificed His son for us, good that Jesus went through with it, even though he didn’t to, for the evil generation back then. Total obedience and faith. Good. But the world is still evil, still in sin.

            But everlasting life versus burning at judgement day, that will be determined by your moral state as you return to dust, or upon Jesus’ return, if you’re alive then. Are you at that point living ‘in sin’, or are you living ‘in righteousness’?

            -But if the wicked man turns from all the sins he has committed, keeps all My statutes, and does what is just and right, he will surely live; he will not die. 22None of the transgressions he has committed will be held against him. Because of the righteousness he has practiced, he will live. 23Do I take any pleasure in the death of the wicked? declares the Lord GOD. Wouldn’t I prefer that he turn from his ways and live?

            24But if a righteous man turns from his righteousness and practices iniquity, committing the same abominations as the wicked, will he live? None of the righteous acts he did will be remembered. Because of the unfaithfulness and sin he has committed, he will die.

            25Yet you say, ‘The way of the Lord is not just.’

            Hear now, O house of Israel: Is it My way that is unjust? Is it not your ways that are unjust?

            26If a righteous man turns from his righteousness and practices iniquity, he will die for this. He will die because of the iniquity he has committed.

            27But if a wicked man turns from the wickedness he has committed and does what is just and right, he will save his life. 28Because he considered and turned from all the transgressions he had committed, he will surely live; he will not die.

            29Yet the house of Israel says, ‘The way of the Lord is not just.’

            Are My ways unjust, O house of Israel? Is it not your ways that are unjust?

            30Therefore, O house of Israel, I will judge you, each according to his ways, declares the Lord GOD. Repent and turn from all your transgressions, so that your iniquity will not become your downfall. 31Cast away from yourselves all the transgressions you have committed, and fashion for yourselves a new heart and a new spirit. Why should you die, O house of Israel?

            Do you think many ‘think’ they are saved by the blood of Jesus, but actually aren’t, because they still sin, day in day out. What is sin? Scripture does tell us. If we are In Christ, God abides with us, we cannot sin, yet so many do, so has the blood of Jesus changed their heart, or did they see the light and decide it was easier to stay in the dark, with their sin?

            The cold hard facts are colder and harder than most would like to admit it appears. God is just, but He can’t have shittiness inside that pure gold 2,200km x 2,200km golden Jerusalem with Him can He? Nope, the shitty ones can wander outside, in the dark, not seeing His light, forever.

            Man, I for one cannot wait to see His face. But I feel sad for those who won’t make the cut.

            • Aeoli Pera says:

              >But everlasting life versus burning at judgement day, that will be determined by your moral state as you return to dust, or upon Jesus’ return, if you’re alive then.

              That isn’t correct at all. See: https://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-lose-salvation.html

            • Aeoli Pera says:

              Specifically, you’re preaching the heresy of Pelagianism. You would probably be interested in The Da Vinci Code, which venerates Pelagius.

            • richy says:

              I have looked at gotquestions before. They err in just about everything.

              Better to look at what the messiah Jesus said, and his apostles. In scripture, the word of God, not the teachings of men.

              Pelagius was a great Saint though, lovely name too. Rome fucked him, satan’s guys of course.

              Jesus said….

              ‘Not everyone saying to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of the heavens, but the one doing the will of My Father in the heavens. 22Many will say to Me in that the day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23And then I will declare unto them, ‘I never knew you; depart you from Me, those working lawlessness.’

              Not everyone will enter, those working lawlessness will be told to depart. ‘Our pastor said we weren’t under the law’ they will cry! Tough shit, Jesus will reply, I told you to be wise as serpents, to watch out for deceivers. But you liked your sin, turned away from the light of my truth. Away from our Father. (paraphrase, he didn’t actually say tough shit).

              What is a ‘Christian’ anyway? It’s someone ‘in the messiah’ I think, walking as he walked, being obedient and also perfect, as our Father in heaven is perfect. Can someone born again of the messiah sin anyway? What does scripture say?

              ‘Everyone committing sin also commits lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness. 5And you know that he appeared, so that He might take away sins; and in Him there is no sin. 6Anyone abiding in him does not sin; anyone sinning has not seen him, nor has he known him.

              7Little children,b let no one lead you astray; the one practicing righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. 8The one practicing sin is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. For this reason the Son of God was revealed, so that He might destroy the works of the devil.

              9Anyone having been born of God does not practice sin, because His seed abides in him, and he is not able to continue sinning, because he has been born of God. 10Through this, the children of God and the children of the devil are manifest: anyone not practicing righteousness is not of God, and also the one not loving his brother.’

              ‘Everyone committing sin also commits lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness. 5And you know that He appeared, so that He might take away sins; and in Him there is no sin. 6Anyone abiding in Him does not sin; anyone sinning has not seen Him, nor has he known Him.

              7Little children,b let no one lead you astray; the one practicing righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous. 8The one practicing sin is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning. For this reason the Son of God was revealed, so that He might destroy the works of the devil.

              9Anyone having been born of God does not practice sin, because His seed abides in him, and he is not able to continue sinning, because he has been born of God’

              Darn, that seems very clear to me. What do you think?

              I reckon a shitload of ‘churchians’ are going to die in their sin, shitloads already have died in their sin. They were not ‘in Christ’, because those in Christ, with God abiding with them, they cannot sin, it’s not possible. In or out. After a suitable period of sanctification of course, a year or two tops. Majority are ‘out’. Still sinning. Grace they think. Nah, grace was for the time before you came to the light, and a brief period thereafter, as you are sanctified, if you stay on the very narrow path.

              Yup, lotsa people will wake up, expecting to be caught up to them clouds, but instead will see a handsome guy on a throne, who will read to them their sins from a book and then chuck them into a big fiery lake. Damn, who would want to be those guys?

              I guess I gotta say….repent, sinners.

            • Aeoli Pera says:

              >Pelagius was a great Saint though, lovely name too. Rome fucked him, satan’s guys of course.

              Preaching that heresy is not permitted here. Further comments to that effect will be spammed.

  2. Pingback: Space octopus demon as collective unconscious | Aeoli Pera

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s