I will state axiomatically that the revealed preference of homo sapiens is exploitative economic relations with other humans, the most stable form of which is the cartel, which are maintained by an asymmetric flow of information. The revealed preference is seen in the neurological changes which accompany dopamine saturation (The Molecule of More), e.g. people who perceive they are in a position of power begin to champion the necessity of opinion censorship, despite that they previously protested opinion censorship when they perceived they were in the submissive position. The rest is speculative, inferred from the work of Diego Gambetta’s book “Codes of the Underworld”. I say “economic relations” instead of slavery because slavery implies the master has at least some responsibility to guide and maintain their slaves, which are forms of capital costs. A “company store” type of model has all the benefits of slavery while demanding the slaves also organize an economic system that will keep them alive and working. Comfort is therefore assumed to be a more reliable predictor of behavior in k-selected (stable, predictable, harsh) societies than expression of social dominance (will-to-power), except at the very top where the latter is subject to unmediated selection pressure.
Cartel stability is mediated by mafia government:
The form of cartel agreementsDiego Gambetta and Peter Reuter
The central problem for cartels is to design agreements which can be maintained over time. Three aspects of agreements, which are relevant to human cooperation generally, are also relevant for establishing cartels: the rules to be followed by members, the means of detecting rule violators, and the sanctions to be imposed against violators. Weakness in any of the three is likely to lead to defections and breakdown of the cartel (Stigler, 1964)
Conspiracy among the many: The mafia in legitimate industries
Cartels, though more distributed than proper monopolies, still stagnate over time via the Iron Law of Bureaucracy. To lengthen their lifespans, they must be protected from economic disruption by upstarts with better technology or responsiveness to market conditions. This is where serialization becomes necessary.
What is Serialization?
-Serialization means that information must be processed sequentially as opposed to in parallel.
-Highly serialized channels of information command high rents, like Real Estate.
-But they also bottleneck the process.
(^I can’t source this yet because it’s unpublished.)
- Examples of serialization of information are anytime someone demands that “all X must go through Y”:
- Patent office
- Startup process
- University system
- Media censors (Net neutrality = “not all information must go through channels favored by ISPs”)
- Payment processors
- New hires (must go through HR)
- Firing (must go through HR)
- Big 5 publishing houses
- “All video games must be greenlit by AAA game studios.”
- “All online sellers must go through Amazon.”
- “All political opinion must be expressed within the Republican-Democratic uniparty voting system.”
Every monopoly that was ever disrupted or ripe for it requires the suppression of alternative information streams. The most interesting forms of information to humans are violence (ref. Propertarianism), price signals, social signalling (ref. biological signalling theory), and those which provide hope of increased future adaptivity (we can group these under “honesty” signals–these are the driving force of the red pill as consumer item).
The incentive for serialization can be explained by Lanchester’s Laws. Watch the following video from the timestamp to the 3:23 mark:
This is Lanchester’s “linear” law.
For ancient combat, between phalanxes of soldiers with spears, say, one soldier could only ever fight exactly one other soldier at a time.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanchester’s_laws
Serialization = the linear law. Lanchester’s linear law favors the powerful few (modeled here as “good weapons”) at the expense of the weak many. The 300 at the Hot Gates are a good example of serialization.
But there are two laws: the linear law and the square law. Lanchester’s square law favors the less powerful many:
With firearms engaging each other directly with aimed shooting from a distance, they can attack multiple targets and can receive fire from multiple directions. The rate of attrition now depends only on the number of weapons shooting. Lanchester determined that the power of such a force is proportional not to the number of units it has, but to the square of the number of units. This is known as Lanchester’s square law.
The battle of 4chan vs. Shia Labeouf was a good demonstration of the square law (parallelization). Though Shia Labeouf had information superiority in the situation, the internet enabled a very large number of people to collaborate and overcome it despite their extreme information inferiority on the individual level.
Some inventions, such as the longbow, the rifle, the internet, and unregulated social media, enable the different forms of information (violence, price, social signals, honesty/adaptivity) to be applied more according to the square law. Others, such as heavy plate armor, copy protection, and surveillance technology, enable social competitors to practice a strategy of serialization and monopolization: “All who want X must go through me/us.” The teleology of which is to reduce everyone else’s signalling ability to zero (i.e. their ability to engage with society), then allow them to die, blame them for it, and spit on their graves. The most telling sign that this process is out of control is when the higher-ups take away a tool that works and replace it with a process that doesn’t work and a call-in troubleshooting line that can’t fix anything, except for those who have enough influence within the bureaucracy to escalate the problem to said higher-ups, i.e. a different form of approval. This is often referred to in biblical language as “making bricks without straw”.
Based on this list, guess when the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was started: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_reactors#United_States. Nuclear reactors take about 10 years to build. Not a single American reactor designed after the 1970s has been completed and entered commercial operation. The answer, of course, is the NRC was created in 1974. “All new reactors must be approved by the NRC.” In 1969 Thorium molten salt technology was the future. The truth is the NRC was created to stamp “No” on viable blueprints. I don’t even know anything about nuclear reactors, but I can read a table. You would never guess my theory about who didn’t want the US to have an alternative, clean, sustainable energy source.
All nuclear technology must be approved by the Anglo-Zionist axis of approval because such serialized channels of information are enforced with massive preemptive escalations of violence. Technology that works is allowed to exist, provided no one knows about it outside the deep underground military bases (DUMBs). Market competition threatens the mafia value proposition. Personally, I blame groups with pathologically high average extraversion, i.e. Americans, and immigrants generally (both groups are characterized by high extraversion). Extraverts like everybody to be at the same party with the same apps on their phones (monoculture), because it increases the Metcalf value of their network through quantity (at the expense of individual quality).
what if some people are natural born slaves who take any order from natural born slave masters?!? what if it was biological? should the sheep herd the shepherd?!? wouldn’t that then save a lot of trouble with these new daily lengthy writs? the wheel was invented once, whats the point of describing it 6 bazillion times from 6 gorillion angles? I am proposing a radical new “theory”, it should start with the letter E because sounds good. the benefit? save a shit ton of time for tharded people who obsssess about muh “human” condition because it clearly isn’t going anywhere and with his radical new theory E, you can also have clean streets safe from kikes and niggers and americans.
incidentally, they are already testing this E out in CHYNA
free communication between sapes made mental illness the new norm and destroyed the west, the hippies were the bad guys all along and the arpanet, DOD, were the good guyes all along.
let me be blunt; interacting, with their interaction (sapes), is so damning it will leave you retarded with asscancer. this is why sapes need to be “oppressed” at all times, they don’t want any freedom or demoracy because then they turn into satanic portals from hell with imps and clockwork elves running free in their corpus, contacting chillums through the pocket gay.io turning everything into pedo and hell on earth. THEY DON’T HAVE THE BIOLOGICAL FACULTIES TO WARD OF THE EVIL NEVER HAD ‘EM NEVER WILL HAVE ITZ THAT SIMP.
come home white man, lets “oppress”, liberate, them together
Hard-wired biology comes from adaptation to the ecology.
You’re tired Bice, take a break.
Hard-wired biology comes from adaptation to the ecology. <— what if some people can shape ecology around them because they shaped themselves over time? also literally in the bibble that MAN was given dominion over shit. why is it so outrageous that they end up ruling everything? itz not random chance at display here or are you just finally acknowledging edenism in vague terms? take the E-pill raveioli, you'll go from 6 to 12 hours of cardio in no time. whats the point of captioning reality everyday in 6 gorililion filthers? isn't blergh! a heaving regurgitating sound? accept reality for what it is it stop fighting it and stop making yourself ill in the process.
Imagine being a western intellectual and unironically say "yeah dude I still browse and post in 2020 for an answer because me be searching things whats wrong with that HUH gonna me be fixxing society n shit?" imagine letting wahmen and chillums run wild on such a thing when western man himself turned into a gay retard thanks to the internet…nobody can honesty and intellectually recommend such a pastime you just can't.
a bunker? thats tangible.
a lightning-greased electronic "to-do" list? sure.
a blergh? why? whatfor? and for how long?
join the winning team, your disavovwal of rump (western political system) and vox (western internet system) is a good step, now take the final censor-everything pill. now glorious internet will be party-approved +200 IQ content only while sapes try to get their heads around crossing a pedestrian section when the green light be shining in order to not infract a scs penalty!!! such creatures should not, and can not heh!, share their "thoughts" with each other, for a stable prosper society. and stable and proper it be.
no kwanstanianisms allowed.
"Tbh I don’t even read these anymore because you only have the one joke."
You will come around soon enough when you realize you came full circle a while ago yourself. in the realm of the dumpster fire you and nobody else just aint be gonna doing any winning because there is nothing on the table to win.
// friendly 500 year old panda greeting Uncle Xi
Man, that must have taken a while to write. Take a rest, you’ve earned it!
Tbh I don’t even read these anymore because you only have the one joke. Putting it in all-caps and memes doesn’t make it less tired. Remember back in 2015? You had lots of different jokes. But you’re getting tired. Time for a vacation.
>The revealed preference is seen in the neurological changes which accompany dopamine saturation (The Molecule of More), e.g. people who perceive they are in a position of power begin to champion the necessity of opinion censorship, despite that they previously protested opinion censorship when they perceived they were in the submissive position.
I must note that it is just not any kind of dopaminergic event, or ‘dopamine saturation’ that produces this- its ‘winning’.
(And ‘winning’ is also androgenic, thus it lowers anxiety and increases risk-taking and pain threshold).
Per ‘the winner effect’:
‘winning’ boosts androgen receptors in parts of brain that cause motivation and social aggression.
This isn’t going to happen from watching porn or meme compilations, even though these are extremely dopaminergic. What’s the difference? Dopamine is generally motivation, or assimilation of novelty (as well as being very much tied to consciously controlled movement, which is directly triggered by acetycholine as usual in muscle contraction) but the thing at the end of the ‘motivation chain’ can change.
IE- Orgasm, to my current knowledge, is the exact opposite of ‘dopaminergic’, but the build up to it is dopamine out the wazoo (to a drug-free brain).
So, the buildup of things can be the same but the payoff radically different chemically.
The interesting thing about ‘winning’ compared to addiction is the up-regulation.
Assuming you keep winning, the hunger will only grow instead of burning out (which is all that happens in addiction given time. Drugs are not at all a perfect simulation of winning).
>Comfort is therefore assumed to be a more reliable predictor of behavior in k-selected (stable, predictable, harsh) societies than expression of social dominance (will-to-power), except at the very top where the latter is subject to unmediated selection pressure.
The striver is seeking comfort with himself, believing he can only be comfortable if he has power (or- will only give himself permission to be comfortable if he has power).
But ‘comfort’ is too loose a label. Existential comfort? Is hedonic pleasure ‘comfort’? The comfort of having food and water?
To go by the dictionary: to soothe, console, or reassure.
By this what isnt an attempt at comfort? There are only time horizons, and the sacrifice of present discomfort for future comfort (or the reverse). Or of life discomfort for afterlife comfort. Etc.
But I’ll stop being autistic :P
I know what you meant is that people in harsh K societies are more likely to be happy from ‘just’ living to adulthood (to become a simple carpenter or wtver),
whereas in the kongo a much larger segment of the (male) population will actively try to be “the big man” because each man’s father was able to breed (usually prodigously…) because he tried to do the same. (And they are mostly all stupid because there isnt nearly as much selecting for that in such an environment)
I deff think this is right.
In our society it is now not much of a difference and itll go away completely now that women are individually choosing their own mates (reliably picking will to power types almost every time).
Or maybe not!
If Vaknin is right then most modern women are narcissists and will actually mate with betas who cant threaten their egos.
Youll have the worst of both worlds- weak, useless, men + bitchy narcissist power hungry women.
Id rather fuck off to the kongo and teach them the gospel of gorilla mindset in between stealing all their bitchez and starting a child army, nyakuh)
I just realized I didn’t use the term “inelastic” in this entire essay.
>In 1969 Thorium molten salt technology was the future.
This is the perspective of nerds outside of the industry. The various national “nuclear villages” have always favored LMFBRs.
>The answer, of course, is the NRC was created in 1974.
I think the real answer is to be found in declining capital investment and the passing of the ’70s energy price shocks..
Yes well, now that those are over I have a nuclear reactor to sell you.
People who find nuclear energy cool (as I do) tend to assume that because it’s cool it must be economical, but in electricity markets installation costs are more important than operating costs, and nuclear is more expensive to install. The civil nuclear industry only exists as a spinoff of weapons production and it would never have been created without the military applications. There’s still plenty of coal and gas left.
>in electricity markets installation costs are more important than operating costs
I’ll take your word on that.
>The civil nuclear industry only exists as a spinoff of weapons production and it would never have been created without the military applications.
That would be true regardless, because humans only innovate in order to kill each other.