That’s the whole theory, actually. The original term was “shape rotators” but I like Steve Sailer’s suggestion of “shapelords” better. Anyway, the whole idea is the two subspecies had very unbalanced cognitive profiles but when you put the two together you get the particular genius of white Europeans…and very confused patterns of breeding and political organization.
Neanderthals were all redneck engineers who never documented their work while living and breeding like orangutans. (It looks like my previous work on the similarities between orangutans and neanderthals has disappeared into the black hole of Koanic’s external hard drive so I’ll have to reproduce it from memory at some point.) Cro magnons were all policy wonks with urban planning manifestos in their desk drawers while living and breeding like…I actually don’t know that one. It’s pretty similar to homo sapiens because I don’t think they developed the idea of “settling down” until after the hybridization. So just imagine high school never ends. Maybe it’s gorillas instead of chimpanzees or something, I dunno, I’ve never read the wikis of the other great apes.
One thing I’m sure about is shapelord Neanderthals prefer Star Wars and wordcel Cro magnons prefer Star Trek and if anyone disagrees I will prove it on his body.
Aeoli Pera 
Does that mean that for Albion to survive, I’ll need to lean into cutting sugar, ice baths and enginiggering as hard as possible?
That’s not implied by what I’m saying here, but yes I’d lean into those things if you’re interested in a future for White Children.
How about using Phantasia, Hyperphantasia, Hypophantasia, Aphantasia and subvocalization and not giving in to new online psyops and packaged terms?
> while living and breeding like…I actually don’t know that one.
while living and breeding for 2.5 kids
Having a small number of kids is more of a neanderthal thing. In the modern day low fertility is due to female years in education.
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/378244/two-and-a-half-kids#378265
Aw man, I should have used this picture:
Men are chimpanzees, women are bonobos, and civilization is all about behaving like gibbons.
We wuz… Munkeez!
“One thing I’m sure about is shapelord Neanderthals prefer Star Wars”, uh oh.
“Neanderthals were all redneck engineers who never documented their work while living and breeding like orangutans…Cro magnons were all policy wonks with urban planning manifestos in their desk drawers while living and breeding like…I actually don’t know that one.”
So is that why I have plans for some overly ambitous civilization spanning technical warlock tower, but I hate doing paperwork?
Also Cro-mags(twenty bucks says all current words and concepts of ancient historical people are more than fifty percent wrong) maybe their sex was somehow idol based? Like they got off(excuse the crudeness) to graven images(or an ideal that may have existed in part in their head)?
> So is that why I have plans for some overly ambitous civilization spanning technical warlock tower, but I hate doing paperwork?
That’s actually more of a technocrat thing. It’s a concrete representation of the alchemist’s thing, and as mentioned everybody thinks that in a just world they’d be their boss’s boss.
> maybe their sex was somehow idol based? Like they got off(excuse the crudeness) to graven images(or an ideal that may have existed in part in their head)?
You’re describing pornography. I’m talking more about breeding patterns, e.g. black people are high in dark triad traits because that’s who breeds, and they have a lot of disparity in sexual outcomes because they’re polygamous.
Would beauty be a cro-mag thing or thal, and how do you figure?
I could possibly see myself yearning to be a technokaiser, but not anything to do with a beurocrat(shivers).
Beauty appears to be a modern development, evolved in tandem with high European IQs during the holocene.