Slightly elaborated definition of moral courage

“Capacity or tendency to apply moral effort (Kmac) to overcome stress in the pursuit of moral foundations (Haidt).” Mathematically: Moral courage = Virtue * Stress. So if we also say Vice = 1 / Virtue, we also have Moral Courage = Stress / Vice, which in plain English means “the more stress it takes to break down your self-control, the more moral courage you have.”

Prove me wrong. What’s nice about stress is you can measure it en masse using vices as a proxy, which is a prima facie case for my definition. But we’d have to break that out into things like acute stress, chronic stress, fear, pain, etc.

>Googles “measurement of fear”
>NSA be like “raise the threat level on that one”

If it doesn’t make you cackle it’s not real science.

About Aeoli Pera

Maybe do this later?
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Slightly elaborated definition of moral courage

  1. "Cant math this!" - MC Squared says:

    Are stress and virtue flipped in this?
    It takes infinite moral courage to make a virtuous choice when there is no stress?

  2. walt says:

    How are you defining vices and virtues?
    Your own definition, or some others?

    • Aeoli Pera says:

      In the abstract, unmeasurable sense: each individual’s superego. In practical, measurable terms…that’s what we need to figure out. Some of the vagueness is intentional for theoretical clarity, but most is because I haven’t figured it out yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s