Sorry about the posting quality, still down for the count.
My preliminary SSMV ratings for the Republican candidates:
Trump = Alpha
Cruz = Beta
Rubio = Lambda
¿Jeb? = Gamma
Carson = Delta, maybe a little Asperger’s (easy read)
Kasich = Delta? (tough read, seems like a typical slimy political degenerate)
Moderator = Lambda?
Aeoli Pera 
Trump is practically a parody of alpha, its like he walked out of an Ayn Rand script. Cruz is a beta because he tries to dialectic when he should rhetoric, it makes him look like a fag. Also, he’s a slimy bastard. Rubio is a straight up homo, he has gay/perv face. I can just see him mincing about in tassled loafers and white chinos. Jeb was abused as a child, responded by hiding behind a facade of agreeable cowardice. Only running because he’s afraid of his parents, who themselves are afraid of their “friends” Carson is a black man trying to live like a white man… forever and always a delta because that is what is politically correct.
Nobody else matters.
Chris Christie could be an alpha… but his testosterone is being held back by all that gelatin. Loooooooooool
I think that is probably true.
“Trump is practically a parody of alpha…”
Almost all Alphas are self-parodies. Whether this is due to the degeneration of leaders or followers or both is an open question.
“…its like he walked out of an Ayn Rand script.”
Except for the austere aestheticism and technical competence, yes. I’m sure she would have been thrilled to blow him. Maybe Megyn Kelly is Rand reincarnated, they have the same jawline.
“Carson is a black man trying to live like a white man… forever and always a delta because that is what is politically correct.”
If character actually mattered for a president, and I’m doubtful of that, he’d get my vote.
Considering the foul moves Cruz has pulled so far, I’d have to peg him as Gamma. Or Alpha. Not Beta. Beta’s don’t do that.
Rest of your analysis looks good.
Betas definitely do that. They are honourable to their alpha, not honourable in general. They CAN be generally honourable, but that’s not an identifying trait of the beta. And Cruz is pegged as beta just because he’s out-alpha’ed by Trump. Without Trump in the picture, Cruz would be it.
Good answer.
“And Cruz is pegged as beta just because he’s out-alpha’ed by Trump.”
Mm, more or less. I peg him as Beta because he makes passionate appeals to facts, arguments, etc. Now, he may be dishonorable (I dunno), but that’s the language he speaks. Trump skips that and goes straight for the language of mass appeal, hence Alpha. Granted, these are probably learned behaviors, but the SSMV framework is not a bestiary so much as a system of dynamics, as in the spirit of this post: https://aeolipera.wordpress.com/2015/03/04/ssmv-dynamics-and-mechanics/
SSMV doesn’t compass morals and ethics. There might be slight overlaps, but it’s a system of interpersonal dynamics with respect to masculine virtues.
Any system of “SMV” will inevitably slide towards moralizing. This is due to reification.
The original PUA based “redpill” notions were much better than modern “neomasculine” because the original red pill was that women sleep with objectively inferior men. However the “male hamster” spins away and generates false consciousness by saying that women’s attraction to men has to do with “masculine virtues”. This is because men value women, and because they value women they automatically attribute to them natures that are far too pure. What men have to do, is as a class* realize that it is they who create the value of women, that it is their self-generated valuing capacity which enables to do this (their capacity for romantic idealism), and therefore they can create their own standards without needing the vessel of a woman (a muse) and then impose them onto real women after the fact.
When a man thinks a woman is great it is really he himself who is great, and he just mistakenly projects this onto a blank female canvas, which is why he is so upset when women are slutty because that stains the canvas. It is men who are beautiful, because beauty is literally in the eye of the beholder. In our gynarchic system, man is alienated from his romantic ideal in the exact same way a worker is alienated from the fruit of his labor. After the revolution, he who is last shall be first, because it is precisely those men who suffer from “oneitis” the most who has the greatest creative faculties.
When a man suffers from false consciousness, he believes that women create the value of men, because he thinks, “Well if women really like this guy he must be a really great guy.” This view gives all the power to the fickle whims of women. When a man is enlightened by scientific sexual socialism, he knows that it is men who create the value of women. He knows that if a man really likes a woman, then he must be a really great man.
http://www.theabsolute.net/ottow/sexcharh.html
Sex and Character shows that another world is possible. Of course, the author relapses into reactionary schemes towards the end, because he did not go far enough. He lived before the advent of sexual capitalism and could not see the full revolutionary implications of his own text. However, now that sexual capitalism has had time (since the ’20s at least) to fully destroy the remnants of the old society, and that a classical sexual economy has been developed (“game”, “the red pill”, “PUA” etc.), it is now time for a critique of classical sexual economy; it is time for the development of Marxist sexual economy. It is time to stop developing theoretical systems to accommodate ourselves to what is — to the realities of the sexual marketplace — and to start to develop theoretical systems for the ruthless criticism and utter annihilation of the current order, to change those realities and midwife into being a new world-historical order, a new millennium of enlightened progress.
“The point is to change it.”
*this means via a vanguard party that can enlighten and guide the masses.
Aeoli, have you seen this? https://black2tell.wordpress.com
No, I haven’t. Now I’ve read quite a bit of it. The writer strikes me as ENFP, which is off-putting, but I have a known tendency to underestimate the ability of this personality type.
Heaviside’s comment wins the internet. The idea of an inverse sexual hierarchy and the application of marxism to it is just brilliant. I’ve been expounding this idea for years but I believe that it now constitutes a viable threat to the existing order.
http://www.returnofkings.com/78819/how-fast-approaching-sexbot-technology-is-making-women-fearful
Women believe that what will happen is all the nasty, unattractive betas will disappear with the advent of this kind of technology. What women don’t understand is that they, themselves are the ones who are irrelevant and will be replaced.
Yes, sexbots are good, but we still need to seize the means of reproduction and overthrow the government. Sexbots are just a way for people to retreat into their rooms and say “leave me alone”. “Well I’m not going to leave you alone! I want you to get mad!” We have to take power. We have to take the fight to TPTB. The “Illuminati” should be afraid of us. 200,000 people will never change an election, but a 200,000 man army could march across this country with impunity. We will make the District of Columbia look like Democratic Cambodia.
Mao’s circumstances required him to embrace agrarian socialism and the people’s war. Our revolutionary situation requires us to embrace beta uprising. The example of Aum Shinrikyo shows that even totally marginal people (“losers”/”betas”) can band together and stockpile enough WMDs to kill billions. That is how 4GW will be carried out in developed countries like America. This is why Benjamin Creme was trained at Lubyanka. Stefan Molyneux was able to recruit alienated teenagers just chatting with them while playing PC games. Even H.W. was a moonie. The future is apocalyptic cult warfare.
The struggle for the control of reproduction will determine the fate of all mankind.
>Yes, sexbots are good, but we still need to seize the means of reproduction and overthrow the government.
Is that the royal “we”?
I wonder about the future of sexbots, because I can see it going two ways. 1) Sexbots are a vice for *extreme* losers, therefore they never achieve tacit acceptance in the way alcohol, caffeine, and porn have. 2) Sexbots are seen by TPTB as a social lubricant for extreme losers like alcohol (which relaxes the anxiety of living in close proximity with other humans), therefore acceptance is tacitly *encouraged* by TPTB and eventually accepted as NORMAL. Because NORMAL is the most important thing in the world.
>200,000 people will never change an election, but a 200,000 man army could march across this country with impunity.
Optimistic.
>We will make the District of Columbia look like Democratic Cambodia.
Change I can believe in.
> The future is apocalyptic cult warfare.
I wonder. We’re playing with bigger numbers and smaller probabilities than I think even you can grok.
>The struggle for the control of reproduction will determine the fate of all mankind.
Nothing new under the sun. But I understand you’re the “end of history” sort.
Dude. You must write science fiction. I’ll preorder whatever you’re offering.
I assume you’re addressing Heaviside here. That is a plausible career choice for him if financial witch hunting turns out to be too boring.